From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12A76C2BB85 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 21:14:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD96020753 for ; Thu, 9 Apr 2020 21:14:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lca.pw header.i=@lca.pw header.b="mpEcu9oq" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727533AbgDIVOt (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:14:49 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f195.google.com ([209.85.222.195]:42241 "EHLO mail-qk1-f195.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727331AbgDIVOs (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:14:48 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f195.google.com with SMTP id x66so229566qkd.9 for ; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 14:14:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lca.pw; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mPZ1Crw8eOW/x4DBqeSZklPBJbmwIyV+b71mBMMt/XA=; b=mpEcu9oqPI5v1uDdoflpAfmaGrxhmS3S92KsvTmM9/mPRZ6sAfeRS/xV4EMeO3bziv eYfF7Zzv8nX8BdTm1ZOghvn0jCBJcsYBO2dMEB+x4s8ys1WJ180iQAJWe6yvkuJUVwMG rNkrRuSzIHMFjFEX5AFO7PASr3qM+MejJaQAEUDANOkD5rZIz2pzT9DtS9FyhVl+oJVb kkR3iBb25CeeXXxQI3nbShg1JZWREKE8bHN9cVtP32VE3oH80SeKqnFJmtSBpcVuiRa8 JiP8I6tCsmP6bqG+9th7armJ2YN75rHQiDjExNhtU4KPp/8Wu26fuoZ1JqQjf3JtQsqW uMfQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=mPZ1Crw8eOW/x4DBqeSZklPBJbmwIyV+b71mBMMt/XA=; b=D1zv2wnKBlkiOn1saLEESdgyNSz/cICQcoiULMAiGC2dW7qkeUWEN/+Kk/Dpm/JWYb ZuKVDSr0e4Op6yIPV/c3FOwzpcAie00JwdZICnylrOBJHMEGgTpLUKfcd32FnekFCzl5 +s5Mqtwq/HOOArMEKYL91Ng/aO488skYf2FjlDE4/AkL6+EhEXDvSNaDs5vLBl4kT/hh csyGgLUnXt60dtZAkZ+rsBaaW+VJ7ommQWL6H80bPN9bqFibqN8qcO2PhagZ/v6sHlwf tMafBpd81OFwD+E4tdmWg2OkCQWdEXMt7lX8eE4jCEfrhPSb2uyWTEjVuxWsYT43wwyz o4pA== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PuYSiWMA0bP2HpY+MXT0Vhskzz4EJcuzFn108XdX/myT4opFjjmP XRbD9rJt39emH0Dv41fMWuSvrQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypI/mjrS5BMQ6tlVRk1yDVd5dIgAzGv/NF9nAs1y4Eo5vYcNPLLmt8C6D6aw+4HbEjaECyl3TQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:11:: with SMTP id j17mr859091qki.117.1586466888215; Thu, 09 Apr 2020 14:14:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.153] (pool-71-184-117-43.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [71.184.117.43]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p10sm62002qtu.14.2020.04.09.14.14.46 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Apr 2020 14:14:47 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.4 \(3608.80.23.2.2\)) Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] mm: Two small fixes for recent syzbot reports From: Qian Cai In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 9 Apr 2020 17:14:46 -0400 Cc: Dmitry Vyukov , Stephen Rothwell , Andrew Morton , Peter Xu , LKML , Linux-MM Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9C21961E-24D3-4C97-A5AB-B70451E4F952@lca.pw> References: To: Linus Torvalds X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.80.23.2.2) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On Apr 9, 2020, at 2:06 PM, Linus Torvalds = wrote: >=20 > On Thu, Apr 9, 2020 at 10:58 AM Qian Cai wrote: >>=20 >> Agree to make a big deal part. My point is that when kicking trees of = linux-next, it also could reduce the exposure of many patches (which = could be bad) to linux-next and miss valuable early testing either from = robots or human. >=20 > Sure. But I'd want to be notified when something gets kicked out, so > that I then know not to pull it. >=20 > So it would reduce the exposure of patches, but it would also make > sure those patches then don't make it upstream. >=20 > Untested patches is fine - as long as nobody else has to suffer = through them. Excellent. It now very much depends on how Stephen will notify you when a tree, a patchset or even a developer should be blacklisted for some = time to make this a success.=