From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3966C6379F for ; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 15:03:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S234643AbjBUPDi (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:03:38 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:55732 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S234123AbjBUPDf (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Feb 2023 10:03:35 -0500 Received: from wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de (wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de [80.237.130.52]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4356F2118; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 07:03:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [2a02:8108:8980:2478:8cde:aa2c:f324:937e]; authenticated by wp530.webpack.hosteurope.de running ExIM with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) id 1pUUAi-0002sD-Ml; Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:03:12 +0100 Message-ID: <9a0bfef8-0b5d-f4d0-a8a5-4bbcacc5c0fb@leemhuis.info> Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2023 16:03:11 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.7.2 Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "venus: firmware: Correct non-pix start and end addresses" Content-Language: en-US, de-DE From: Thorsten Leemhuis To: Vikash Garodia Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "mka@chromium.org" , Albert Esteve , "stanimir.varbanov@linaro.org" , Enric Balletbo i Serra , Andy Gross , Bjorn Andersson , Konrad Dybcio , Stanimir Varbanov , "Vikash Garodia (QUIC)" , "linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-media@vger.kernel.org" , Fritz Koenig , "Dikshita Agarwal (QUIC)" , "Rajeshwar Kurapaty (QUIC)" , Javier Martinez Canillas , Linux regressions mailing list , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Reply-To: Linux regressions mailing list References: <20230207102254.1446461-1-javierm@redhat.com> <70c01751-1dd7-c4bd-a96e-94dea437aa40@redhat.com> <6f97a117-0d9c-e21b-9adf-50f2233ba9e3@leemhuis.info> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-bounce-key: webpack.hosteurope.de;regressions@leemhuis.info;1676991795;fc75e8d9; X-HE-SMSGID: 1pUUAi-0002sD-Ml Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 15.02.23 14:18, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: > On 15.02.23 11:57, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 11:53 AM Linux regression tracking (Thorsten >> Leemhuis) wrote: >>> On 11.02.23 15:27, Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis) wrote: >>>> On 10.02.23 11:07, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote: >>>>> On 2/10/23 10:22, Vikash Garodia wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>> So what should we do about this folks? Since not allowing the driver to probe on >>>>>>> at least SC7180 is a quite serious regression, can we revert for now until a proper >>>>>>> fix is figured out? >>>>>> I am able to repro this issue on sc7180 and discussing with firmware team on the cause >>>>>> of reset failure. The original patch was raised for fixing rare SMMU faults during warm >>>>>> boot of video hardware. Hence looking to understand the regressing part before we >>>>>> proceed to revert. >>>>> Great, if you are working on a proper fix then that would be much better indeed. >>>> Yeah, that's great, but OTOH: there is almost certainly just one week >>>> before 6.2 will be released. Ideally this should be fixed by then. >>>> Vikash, do you think that's in the cards? If not: why not revert this >>>> now to make sure 6.2 works fine? >>> Hmm, no reply. And we meanwhile have Wednesday and 6.2 is almost >>> certainly going to be out on Sunday. And the problem was called "a quite >>> serious regression" above. So why not quickly fix this with the revert, >>> as proposed earlier? >>> Vikash? Javier? >> >> I agree with you, that we should land this revert and then properly >> fix the page fault issue in v6.3. >> >> But it's not my call, the v4l2/media folks have to decide that. > > In that case: Mauro, what's your opinion here? > > Thread starts here: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230207102254.1446461-1-javierm@redhat.com/ > > Regression report: > https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/Y9LSMap%2BjRxbtpC8@google.com/ No reply from Mauro and Linus chose to not apply the revert I pointed him to. That at this point leads to the question: Vikash, did you or somebody else make any progress to fix this properly? Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat) -- Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking: https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr If I did something stupid, please tell me, as explained on that page. #regzbot poke