RE: [PATCH v2 11/16] remoteproc: introduce rproc_find_carveout_by_name function

[Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjorn Andersson [mailto:bjorn.andersson@linaro.org]
> Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 2:33 AM
> To: Loic PALLARDY <loic.pallardy@st.com>
> Cc: ohad@wizery.com; linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@st.com>;
> benjamin.gaignard@linaro.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/16] remoteproc: introduce
> rproc_find_carveout_by_name function
> 
> On Thu 30 Nov 08:46 PST 2017, Loic Pallardy wrote:
> > +struct rproc_mem_entry *
> > +rproc_find_carveout_by_name(struct rproc *rproc, char *name)
> 
> In almost all cases after this patch you have to do a snprintf(), so it
> would be better to make this function format the name based on a format
> string and variable arguments.

Good point
/Loic
> 
> > +{
> > +	struct rproc_mem_entry *carveout, *mem = NULL;
> > +
> > +	if (!name)
> > +		return NULL;
> > +
> > +	list_for_each_entry(carveout, &rproc->carveouts, node) {
> > +		/* Compare carveout and requested names */
> > +		if (!strcmp(carveout->name, name)) {
> > +			mem = carveout;
> > +			break;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	return mem;
> > +}
> > +
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn