From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263100AbVGOBkU (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 21:40:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263109AbVGOBkU (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 21:40:20 -0400 Received: from zproxy.gmail.com ([64.233.162.197]:13801 "EHLO zproxy.gmail.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263100AbVGOBkF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Jul 2005 21:40:05 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=TQUNhefG3YoI9ZjLgMCvcDBUPtZjYdFsFaaSglImph0GGeUMw2iNF2M38J4OpUc+jvTRZWM0kSjp2/SoG4DA3NtcjSOTedv8lGGX+5AGU98YlUwj9WKtycyAjS7pgtDDPEhAd/i0fv3jTx+tAhUGPtOVW+rUHCqBvim/jD49pPY= Message-ID: <9a87484905071418404a088ae2@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2005 03:40:03 +0200 From: Jesper Juhl Reply-To: Jesper Juhl To: Linus Torvalds Subject: Re: [PATCH] i386: Selectable Frequency of the Timer Interrupt Cc: Lee Revell , Chris Wedgwood , Andrew Morton , "Brown, Len" , dtor_core@ameritech.net, vojtech@suse.cz, david.lang@digitalinsight.com, davidsen@tmr.com, kernel@kolivas.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, mbligh@mbligh.org, diegocg@gmail.com, azarah@nosferatu.za.org, christoph@lameter.com In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT Content-Disposition: inline References: <42D3E852.5060704@mvista.com> <1121282025.4435.70.camel@mindpipe> <1121286258.4435.98.camel@mindpipe> <20050713134857.354e697c.akpm@osdl.org> <20050713211650.GA12127@taniwha.stupidest.org> <9a874849050714170465c979c3@mail.gmail.com> <1121386505.4535.98.camel@mindpipe> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 7/15/05, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > > On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote: > > > > I don't think this will fly because we take a big performance hit by > > calculating HZ at runtime. > > I think it might be an acceptable solution for a distribution that really > needed it, since it should be fairly simple. However, it's definitely not > the right solution. > > HOWEVER. I bet that somebody who really really cares (hint hint) could > easily make HZ be 1000, and then dynamically tweak the divisor at bootup > to be either 1000, 250, or 100, and then increment "jiffies" by 1, 4 or > 10. > [...] > > Really. I dare you guys. First one to send me a tested patch gets a gold > star. > Testing a patch right now, I'll send it to you as soon as it doesn't blow up on boot (which it currently does). -- Jesper Juhl Don't top-post http://www.catb.org/~esr/jargon/html/T/top-post.html Plain text mails only, please http://www.expita.com/nomime.html