From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1752638AbdK1NRu (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:17:50 -0500
Received: from mout.web.de ([212.227.15.4]:59613 "EHLO mout.web.de"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1752215AbdK1NRs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Tue, 28 Nov 2017 08:17:48 -0500
Subject: Re: ALSA: nm256: Fine-tuning for three function implementations
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org
Cc: Arvind Yadav <arvind.yadav.cs@gmail.com>,
        Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
        Takashi Sakamoto <o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp>,
        kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
References: <d98a2685-ddf9-1cba-839a-d12c5ff8d3ba@users.sourceforge.net>
 <s5hefoy16xg.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <dfa99045-f213-3dad-b1f4-2e90eb38ddbd@users.sourceforge.net>
 <s5h7euq9hqt.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <24f8c777-1eb4-e7e7-9371-79f32700c9dc@users.sourceforge.net>
 <s5hbmjmluba.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <2cbef557-5f89-c630-e108-14ef2ce6b41a@users.sourceforge.net>
 <s5h4lpelqfm.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <1547a4c2-5b70-e3a3-b482-d28c538e615c@users.sourceforge.net>
 <s5hy3mqr5v9.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <c2b7543c-cd2c-f7f6-98f3-23e2ca6f8b90@users.sourceforge.net>
 <s5hshcyr2on.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
 <539adde3-a713-721f-2a0d-1d1ef925fb86@users.sourceforge.net>
 <s5hpo82r1s5.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@users.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <9a9348f4-d059-de28-1445-0189b7fb0ba3@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Tue, 28 Nov 2017 14:17:00 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101
 Thunderbird/52.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <s5hpo82r1s5.wl-tiwai@suse.de>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Language: en-GB
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:fBY1yjSz9tRowsi/qzaqf8XcbUI9akf7AphBIKyLcjohKUjHf2B
 woxshi+x1otOsmopXJoplFUypNzpzhFiioV4eE/WqVVXJLgJ6tQ5Xl9hpv5EvveNYB2P2Hl
 PAkDFSAjmW7Pc7usebrqRwknFxIZPbk7fdwJH8CF+vzTx19PdJmRgLshDtPkRo6L6hOHV8s
 kLGz6W3smroq6iN0zEToQ==
X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:PjFDJdv8WbM=:OmNow5zekqugecSi1Jk9KF
 i7YZruASrE/mpvcoeyqBDO6+scPbW8LMjRDlY5r2ENvpV21dETSpCwqCeYQt7ruPZkbySN/Lr
 PY3XIVy6q7oUSFELOj2R13DyywGLym3UJ9h5UeoJT9aZ7ZsnwUqyjgZsRzkFI5lmlO/D+7cs2
 6+thxjnQWp9ueosKAu1gWk/BtZ55lDDf/x4Pj7U5fVxjIvneqIm3MTfGoXchOZ3OzeKm/PFWO
 HIHHa4Zc3m+vBk1JAjYYMruGfIEp86kSSXf9p81wYw0VSuS7KYGdLtd7SnwI6OgKWMoZ0c2o8
 O6M/xJl5kw7Mm+a8mn+RV7Z7pjiDg4zyqLCL3ab0Cwm7ob/kJdaNRdHFQ1raIBoe6z6cJEIaj
 ws2/484KiBIDq70wMKsTVmtCVgPufs/vX3vOOz45enhLkbu6J5k+vCsW2QadJhM7+3r+L7u1F
 hm0VwlGeHb1amaO/rOIwEGLLeBs9rUTNsT+az9WDor32cnQEcmGWyqMw02Cpt5nRUxzOQ+xqB
 NOc0p2+qZc8+BBEQNYcn8oHaFN241JlGwZpZ+RLpFqV8MLf2oTxs9heXNbwFlpNGI9yTqbP99
 sKi7TQJzsr+Q+jzYYyO4114Fi9Tz5guCraaXdH0I5ghOlj0vWNv9nxdVkfrMCNsLfgtJG/TkS
 a8pmfgGLTtW8x9OiOlEG2No4ABsP+tOLz2nRg4vY2gmEFUK9Ygz/Yi/S/NIWRnJFqlNIqA82W
 DDsnnSnPP3Zsl+utU+nfBtc4ZX71/MRDhrCuEdoRmR6S1+2N8X5NvSmE/rnVv3TswvVXt4zqk
 UjrvOaeSVrBNRVn3+K8Hn5AUM5ZQ4S4TvlN+fCNw54YqzZFdj0=
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

>> Which test results would you like to see or hear (!) from a real device
>> (or a configuration in a virtual machine)?
> 
> I don't mind either case as long as the test works.

How would you notice that a corresponding system test worked
in reasonable ways?


>> I find such a development tool very relevant to reduce your concerns.
> 
> It's about your patches, not my system.

Your own automatic test system could provide a bit of
more confidence for some change possibilities, couldn't it?

Regards,
Markus