linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: Maran Wilson <maran.wilson@oracle.com>,
	x86@kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org,
	jgross@suse.com
Cc: boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, bp@suse.de,
	dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, davem@davemloft.net,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hpa@zytor.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com,
	kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com, linus.walleij@linaro.org,
	luto@kernel.org, mchehab@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com,
	rdunlap@infradead.org, tglx@linutronix.de,
	thomas.lendacky@amd.com, hch@infradead.org, roger.pau@citrix.com,
	rkrcmar@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/7] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point
Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2018 11:46:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9aeeaf85-6ecf-c1e2-640a-657f5bb0f8ef@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1523920175-27287-1-git-send-email-maran.wilson@oracle.com>

On 17/04/18 01:09, Maran Wilson wrote:
> For certain applications it is desirable to rapidly boot a KVM virtual
> machine. In cases where legacy hardware and software support within the
> guest is not needed, Qemu should be able to boot directly into the
> uncompressed Linux kernel binary without the need to run firmware.
> 
> There already exists an ABI to allow this for Xen PVH guests and the ABI
> is supported by Linux and FreeBSD:
> 
>    https://xenbits.xen.org/docs/unstable/misc/pvh.html
> 
> This patch series would enable Qemu to use that same entry point for
> booting KVM guests.

Hi Maran, what happened to this series (and to the QEMU work)?

Paolo

> Changes from v6:
> 
>  * Addressed issues caught by the kbuild test robot:
>     - Restored an #include line that had been dropped by mistake (patch 4)
>     - Removed a pair of #include lines that were no longer needed in a
>       common code file and causing problems for certain 32-bit configs
>       (patchs 4 and 7)
> 
> Changes from v5:
> 
>  * The interface changes to the x86/HVM start info layout have
>    now been accepted into the Xen tree.
>  * Rebase and merge upstream PVH file changes.
>  * (Patch 6) Synced up to the final version of the header file that was
>              acked and pulled into the Xen tree.
>  * (Patch 1) Fixed typo and removed redundant "def_bool n" line.
> 
> Changes from v4:
> 
> Note: I've withheld Juergen's earlier "Reviewed-by" tags from patches
> 1 and 7 since there were minor changes (mostly just addition of
> CONFIG_KVM_GUEST_PVH as requested) that came afterwards.
> 
>  * Changed subject prefix from RFC to PATCH
>  * Added CONFIG_KVM_GUEST_PVH as suggested
>  * Relocated the PVH common files to
>    arch/x86/platform/pvh/{enlighten.c,head.S}
>  * Realized I also needed to move the objtool override for those files
>  * Updated a few code comments per reviewer feedback
>  * Sent out a patch of the hvm_start_info struct changes against the Xen
>    tree since that is the canonical copy of the header. Discussions on
>    that thread have resulted in some (non-functional) updates to
>    start_info.h (patch 6/7) and those changes are reflected here as well
>    in order to keep the files in sync. The header file has since been
>    ack'ed for the Xen tree by Jan Beulich.
> 
> Changes from v3:
> 
>  * Implemented Juergen's suggestion for refactoring and moving the PVH
>    code so that CONFIG_XEN is no longer required for booting KVM guests
>    via the PVH entry point.
>    Functionally, nothing has changed from V3 really, but the patches
>    look completely different now because of all the code movement and
>    refactoring. Some of these patches can be combined, but I've left
>    them very small in some cases to make the refactoring and code
>    movement easier to review.
>    My approach for refactoring has been to create a PVH entry layer that
>    still has understanding and knowledge about Xen vs non-Xen guest types
>    so that it can make run time decisions to handle either case, as
>    opposed to going all the way and re-writing it to be a completely
>    hypervisor agnostic and architecturally pure layer that is separate
>    from guest type details. The latter seemed a bit overkill in this
>    situation. And I've handled the complexity of having to support
>    Qemu/KVM boot of kernels compiled with or without CONFIG_XEN via a
>    pair of xen specific __weak routines that can be overridden in kernels
>    that support Xen guests. Importantly, the __weak routines are for
>    xen specific code only (not generic "guest type" specific code) so
>    there is no clashing between xen version of the strong routine and,
>    say, a KVM version of the same routine. But I'm sure there are many
>    ways to skin this cat, so I'm open to alternate suggestions if there
>    is a compelling reason for not using __weak in this situation.
> 
> Changes from v2:
> 
>  * All structures (including memory map table entries) are padded and
>    aligned to an 8 byte boundary.
> 
>  * Removed the "packed" attributes and made changes to comments as
>    suggested by Jan.
> 
> Changes from v1:
> 
>  * Adopted Paolo's suggestion for defining a v2 PVH ABI that includes the
>    e820 map instead of using the second module entry to pass the table.
> 
>  * Cleaned things up a bit to reduce the number of xen vs non-xen special
>    cases.
> 
> 
> Maran Wilson (7):
>   xen/pvh: Split CONFIG_XEN_PVH into CONFIG_PVH and CONFIG_XEN_PVH
>   xen/pvh: Move PVH entry code out of Xen specific tree
>   xen/pvh: Create a new file for Xen specific PVH code
>   xen/pvh: Move Xen specific PVH VM initialization out of common file
>   xen/pvh: Move Xen code for getting mem map via hcall out of common
>     file
>   xen/pvh: Add memory map pointer to hvm_start_info struct
>   KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point
> 
>  MAINTAINERS                                     |   1 +
>  arch/x86/Kbuild                                 |   2 +
>  arch/x86/Kconfig                                |  14 +++
>  arch/x86/kernel/head_64.S                       |   2 +-
>  arch/x86/platform/pvh/Makefile                  |   5 +
>  arch/x86/platform/pvh/enlighten.c               | 136 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/{xen/xen-pvh.S => platform/pvh/head.S} |   0
>  arch/x86/xen/Kconfig                            |   3 +-
>  arch/x86/xen/Makefile                           |   2 -
>  arch/x86/xen/enlighten_pvh.c                    |  93 +++-------------
>  include/xen/interface/hvm/start_info.h          |  63 ++++++++++-
>  11 files changed, 240 insertions(+), 81 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/pvh/Makefile
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/platform/pvh/enlighten.c
>  rename arch/x86/{xen/xen-pvh.S => platform/pvh/head.S} (100%)
> 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-16 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-16 23:09 [PATCH v7 0/7] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point Maran Wilson
2018-04-16 23:11 ` [PATCH v7 1/7] xen/pvh: Split CONFIG_XEN_PVH into CONFIG_PVH and CONFIG_XEN_PVH Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:18   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:11 ` [PATCH v7 2/7] xen/pvh: Move PVH entry code out of Xen specific tree Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:24   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v7 3/7] xen/pvh: Create a new file for Xen specific PVH code Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:29   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v7 4/7] xen/pvh: Move Xen specific PVH VM initialization out of common file Maran Wilson
2018-04-16 23:12 ` [PATCH v7 5/7] xen/pvh: Move Xen code for getting mem map via hcall " Maran Wilson
2018-04-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v7 6/7] xen/pvh: Add memory map pointer to hvm_start_info struct Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:30   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-16 23:13 ` [PATCH v7 7/7] KVM: x86: Allow Qemu/KVM to use PVH entry point Maran Wilson
2018-04-17  6:41   ` Juergen Gross
2018-04-18  8:11 ` [PATCH v7 0/7] " Linus Walleij
2018-05-02 21:37   ` Maran Wilson
2018-05-16 20:27 ` Maran Wilson
2018-05-18 11:31   ` Paolo Bonzini
2018-05-23 16:56     ` Maran Wilson
2018-11-16 10:46 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2018-11-16 17:17   ` Maran Wilson
2018-11-19 18:25     ` Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9aeeaf85-6ecf-c1e2-640a-657f5bb0f8ef@redhat.com \
    --to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=jgross@suse.com \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=maran.wilson@oracle.com \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=rkrcmar@redhat.com \
    --cc=roger.pau@citrix.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).