From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757940AbZDCFPm (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:15:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752352AbZDCFPd (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:15:33 -0400 Received: from wf-out-1314.google.com ([209.85.200.171]:25064 "EHLO wf-out-1314.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751471AbZDCFPc convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 3 Apr 2009 01:15:32 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=HqVidvXMENJfkIxWJiilTBHyeyHx0NNkuKn+QLJ9zDS0TogkYyKH4ookohqVGpY7vW 1PcQDtT8Tal37SRh/2T1zXLJvqZiubU5dLmgBs53neslTr/fHmmqSEGTsXzxlQ1dP8Wh MglVjQ3+mrAtHH++zlLkZynEogY+AHFryJ9QE= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20090403050246.GM9870@mit.edu> References: <49CCCB0A.6070701@nokia.com> <9b1675090904021724t2fb0a671uc10d8e7bcba0bc5c@mail.gmail.com> <9b1675090904021728y35776377u327f2266d06e2f29@mail.gmail.com> <72dbd3150904021855v440f46a7oc21a7ed28fbfcb13@mail.gmail.com> <9b1675090904021905o7e0cec64lfe4a5372777908b6@mail.gmail.com> <72dbd3150904021919g5405ee40p100eacb085024941@mail.gmail.com> <9b1675090904021928k5a9948f9l8d93b6cbd5531720@mail.gmail.com> <72dbd3150904021958q7795dc62keb54d1fbfaa6abc7@mail.gmail.com> <20090403050246.GM9870@mit.edu> Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 23:15:29 -0600 Message-ID: <9b1675090904022215u612a3c06g98c3dcf3e74571a2@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: EXT4-ish "fixes" in UBIFS From: "Trenton D. Adams" To: Theodore Tso , David Rees , "Trenton D. Adams" , Christian Kujau , Artem Bityutskiy , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 11:02 PM, Theodore Tso wrote: > On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 07:58:17PM -0700, David Rees wrote: >> >> I've got a problematic server with 8GB RAM.  Even if set both to 1, >> that's 80MB and the crappy disks I have in it will often only write >> 10-20MB/s or less due to the seekiness of the workload.  That means >> delays of 5-10 seconds worst case which isn't fun. >> > > People will still be better off moving to ext4, but for people who > aren't quite confident in ext4's stability yet and who want to stick > with ext3, maybe it's a good short-term solution.  Maybe > data=writeback with the rename hueristic would be a better default > than data=ordered for ext3. > >                                                - Ted > I've tried that before... tdamac ~ # mount -t ext3 -o data=writeback,remount,rw /dev/s/sys / mount: / not mounted already, or bad option Does it have to be done on initial mount?