From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Cc: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
Alexey Brodkin <Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com>,
Carlos Palminha <CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper
Date: Tue, 16 May 2017 06:11:36 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9b65e0c2-91d0-e036-b78b-7b18e03a506b@synopsys.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1674301.cQSPGVcRm9@avalon>
Hi Laurent,
On 15-05-2017 08:05, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Monday 15 May 2017 08:47:49 Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 02:04:24PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> On Friday 12 May 2017 17:06:14 Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>> On 12-05-2017 10:35, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>>>> On Tuesday 09 May 2017 18:00:12 Jose Abreu wrote:
>>>>>> + if (mode->status == MODE_OK)
>>>>>> + mode->status =
> drm_mode_validate_connector(connector,
>>>>>>
> mode);
>>>>> I would reverse the arguments order to match the style of the other
>>>>> validation functions.
>>>> Hmm, I think it makes more sense to pass connector first and then
>>>> mode ...
>>> I disagree, as this function validates a mode against a pipeline, the same
>>> way the other validation functions validate a mode against other
>>> parameters, but it's your patch :-)
>> Call it drm_connector_validate_mode, because the first argument is
>> generally the object we operate on :-)
> But the function doesn't validate a mode for a connector, it validates a mode
> for a complete pipeline...
>
Hmm, but note that in the same function there is
drm_mode_validate_size() and drm_mode_validate_flag() calls,
which take as first argument the mode and then the object to
validate (I hadn't seen this). So, maybe leave it as
drm_mode_validate_connector() as it takes a connector as argument
or change to drm_mode_validate_pipeline() as you said, or even
drm_mode_validate_datapath(), drm_mode_validate_videopath(),
drm_mode_validate_components() ?
Best regards,
Jose Miguel Abreu
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-05-16 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-05-09 17:00 [PATCH v2 0/8] Introduce new mode validation callbacks Jose Abreu
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] drm: Add crtc/encoder/bridge->mode_valid() callbacks Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 8:03 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-10 9:05 ` Jose Abreu
2017-05-12 8:24 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-15 6:46 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] drm: Add drm_crtc_mode_valid() Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 7:59 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-10 8:57 ` Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 15:12 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] drm: Add drm_encoder_mode_valid() Jose Abreu
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] drm: Add drm_connector_mode_valid() Jose Abreu
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] drm: Use new mode_valid() helpers in connector probe helper Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 8:01 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-10 8:59 ` Jose Abreu
2017-05-12 9:35 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-12 16:06 ` Jose Abreu
2017-05-14 11:04 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-15 6:47 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-15 7:05 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-16 5:11 ` Jose Abreu [this message]
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] drm: Introduce drm_bridge_mode_valid() Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 13:41 ` Ville Syrjälä
2017-05-10 14:01 ` Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 14:07 ` Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 15:14 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-12 9:38 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-12 10:50 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-12 11:01 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-15 4:18 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-15 6:49 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] drm: Use mode_valid() in atomic modeset Jose Abreu
2017-05-10 16:08 ` Archit Taneja
2017-05-10 17:55 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-12 9:53 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-15 6:50 ` Daniel Vetter
2017-05-09 17:00 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] drm: arc: Use crtc->mode_valid() callback Jose Abreu
2017-05-12 9:57 ` Laurent Pinchart
2017-05-15 1:40 ` Jose Abreu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9b65e0c2-91d0-e036-b78b-7b18e03a506b@synopsys.com \
--to=jose.abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com \
--cc=CARLOS.PALMINHA@synopsys.com \
--cc=daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).