From: 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] numa: numa balancer
Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2019 17:59:02 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9c431cd5-bb9c-8f58-5f67-643b5bd21dd6@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190423090505.GG11158@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
On 2019/4/23 下午5:05, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
[snip]
>>
>> TODO:
>> * improve the logical to address the regression cases
>> * Find a way, maybe, to handle the page cache left on remote
>> * find more scenery which could gain benefit
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/numa/Makefile | 1 +
>> drivers/numa/numa_balancer.c | 715 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>
> So I really think this is the wrong direction. Why introduce yet another
> balancer thingy and not extend the existing numa balancer with the
> additional information you got from the previous patches?
>
> Also, this really should not be a module and not in drivers
The reason why we present the idea in the way of a module is that
it's not suitable for all the situations, a module could be clean
and easier for deploy on demands.
Besides, we assume someone may prefer to have their own logical
on how to do the numa balancer, thus the module give them the way
to DIY easily.
But there are no insist on the style, once the logical is mature
enough, we can merge the idea into CFS, per-cgroup switch could be
enough :-P
Regards,
Michael Wang
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-23 9:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-22 2:10 [RFC PATCH 0/5] NUMA Balancer Suite 王贇
2019-04-22 2:11 ` [RFC PATCH 1/5] numa: introduce per-cgroup numa balancing locality, statistic 王贇
2019-04-23 8:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 9:14 ` 王贇
2019-04-23 8:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 9:32 ` 王贇
2019-04-23 8:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 9:33 ` 王贇
2019-04-23 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-22 2:12 ` [RFC PATCH 2/5] numa: append per-node execution info in memory.numa_stat 王贇
2019-04-23 8:52 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 9:36 ` 王贇
2019-04-23 9:46 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 10:01 ` 王贇
2019-04-22 2:13 ` [RFC PATCH 3/5] numa: introduce per-cgroup preferred numa node 王贇
2019-04-23 8:55 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 9:41 ` 王贇
2019-04-22 2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 4/5] numa: introduce numa balancer infrastructure 王贇
2019-04-22 2:21 ` [RFC PATCH 5/5] numa: numa balancer 王贇
2019-04-23 9:05 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-04-23 9:59 ` 王贇 [this message]
[not found] ` <CAHCio2gEw4xyuoiurvwzvEiU8eLas+5ZLhzmqm1V2CJqvt+cyA@mail.gmail.com>
2019-04-23 2:14 ` [RFC PATCH 0/5] NUMA Balancer Suite 王贇
2019-07-03 3:26 ` [PATCH 0/4] per cpu cgroup numa suite 王贇
2019-07-03 3:28 ` [PATCH 1/4] numa: introduce per-cgroup numa balancing locality, statistic 王贇
2019-07-11 13:43 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 3:15 ` 王贇
2019-07-11 13:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 3:43 ` 王贇
2019-07-12 7:58 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 9:11 ` 王贇
2019-07-12 9:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 10:10 ` 王贇
2019-07-15 2:09 ` 王贇
2019-07-15 12:10 ` Michal Koutný
2019-07-16 2:41 ` 王贇
2019-07-19 16:47 ` Michal Koutný
2019-07-03 3:29 ` [PATCH 2/4] numa: append per-node execution info in memory.numa_stat 王贇
2019-07-11 13:45 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 3:17 ` 王贇
2019-07-03 3:32 ` [PATCH 3/4] numa: introduce numa group per task group 王贇
2019-07-11 14:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 4:03 ` 王贇
2019-07-03 3:34 ` [PATCH 4/4] numa: introduce numa cling feature 王贇
2019-07-08 2:25 ` [PATCH v2 " 王贇
2019-07-09 2:15 ` 王贇
2019-07-09 2:24 ` [PATCH v3 " 王贇
2019-07-11 14:27 ` [PATCH " Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 3:10 ` 王贇
2019-07-12 7:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-07-12 8:58 ` 王贇
2019-07-22 3:44 ` 王贇
2019-07-11 9:00 ` [PATCH 0/4] per cgroup numa suite 王贇
2019-07-16 3:38 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] per-cgroup " 王贇
2019-07-16 3:39 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] numa: introduce per-cgroup numa balancing locality statistic 王贇
2019-07-16 3:40 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] numa: append per-node execution time in cpu.numa_stat 王贇
2019-07-19 16:39 ` Michal Koutný
2019-07-22 2:36 ` 王贇
2019-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] numa: introduce numa group per task group 王贇
2019-07-16 3:41 ` [PATCH v4 4/4] numa: introduce numa cling feature 王贇
2019-07-22 2:37 ` [PATCH v5 " 王贇
2019-07-25 2:33 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] per-cgroup numa suite 王贇
2019-08-06 1:33 ` 王贇
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9c431cd5-bb9c-8f58-5f67-643b5bd21dd6@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).