From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S263470AbTJ0TeY (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:34:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S263478AbTJ0TeY (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:34:24 -0500 Received: from pushme.nist.gov ([129.6.16.92]:21160 "EHLO postmark.nist.gov") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S263470AbTJ0TeX (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:34:23 -0500 To: David Brownell Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Patrick Mochel Subject: Re: APM suspend still broken in -test9 References: <3F9D62DD.9020503@pacbell.net> From: Ian Soboroff Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2003 14:33:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3F9D62DD.9020503@pacbell.net> (David Brownell's message of "Mon, 27 Oct 2003 10:24:29 -0800") Message-ID: <9cffzhezd9i.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Yes, that patch solves it for me, and applies cleanly to -test9. Ian David Brownell writes: > Those are the same symptoms I saw in test7, fixed by: > > http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-kernel&m=106606272103414&w=2 > > Patrick, were you going to submit your patch to resolve this? > I'm thinking this kind of problem would meet Linus's test10 > integration criteria. > > (That's not an APM problem, it's a generic PM problem that'd > show up with swsusp too. And likely even some ACPI systems.) > > - Dave