Re: Regression in Kernel 6.0: System partially freezes with "nvme controller is down"

["Linux kernel regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)" <regressions@leemhuis.info>]

[adding the nvme maintainers and the regressions mailing list to the
list of recipients]

[TLDR: I'm adding this report to the list of tracked Linux kernel
regressions; the text you find below is based on a few templates
paragraphs you might have encountered already in similar form.
See link in footer if these mails annoy you.]

On 11.01.23 23:11, Julian Groß wrote:
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
> when running Linux Kernel version 6.0.12, 6.0.10, 6.0-rc7, or 6.1.4, my
> system seemingly randomly freezes due to the file system being set to
> read-only due to an issue with my NVMe controller.
> The issue does *not* appear on Linux Kernel version 5.19.11 or lower.
> 
> Through network logging I am able to catch the issue:
> ```
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.259288] nvme nvme0:
> controller is down; will reset: CSTS=0xffffffff, PCI_STATUS=0x10
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.259293] nvme nvme0: Does
> your device have a faulty power saving mode enabled?
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.259293] nvme nvme0: Try
> "nvme_core.default_ps_max_latency_us=0 pcie_aspm=off" and report a bug
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.331360] nvme 0000:01:00.0:
> enabling device (0000 -> 0002)
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.331458] nvme nvme0: Removing
> after probe failure status: -19
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371389] nvme0n1: detected
> capacity change from 1953525168 to 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371389] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 1, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371389] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 2, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371392] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 3, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371394] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 5, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371405] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 6, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371406] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 7, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371411] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 8, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371419] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 9, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0, gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371425] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 10, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0,
> gen 0
> Jan  8 14:50:16 x299-desktop kernel: [ 1461.371426] BTRFS error (device
> nvme0n1p4): bdev /dev/nvme0n1p4 errs: wr 11, rd 0, flush 0, corrupt 0,
> gen 0
> ```
> 
> I have tried the suggestion in the log without luck.
> 
> Attached is a log that includes two system freezes, as well as a list of
> PCI(e) devices created by Debian reportbug.
> The first freeze happens at "Jan  8 04:26:28" and the second freeze
> happens at "Jan  8 14:50:16".
> 
> Currently, I am using git bisect to narrow down the window of possible
> commits, but since the issue appears seemingly random, it will take many
> months to identify the offending commit this way.
> 
> The original Debian bug report is here:
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1028309

Thanks for the report. To be sure the issue doesn't fall through the
cracks unnoticed, I'm adding it to regzbot, the Linux kernel regression
tracking bot:

#regzbot ^introduced v5.19..v6.0-rc7
#regzbot title nvme: system partially freezes with "nvme controller is down"
#regzbot ignore-activity

This isn't a regression? This issue or a fix for it are already
discussed somewhere else? It was fixed already? You want to clarify when
the regression started to happen? Or point out I got the title or
something else totally wrong? Then just reply and tell me -- ideally
while also telling regzbot about it, as explained by the page listed in
the footer of this mail.

Developers: When fixing the issue, remember to add 'Link:' tags pointing
to the report (the parent of this mail). See page linked in footer for
details.

Ciao, Thorsten (wearing his 'the Linux kernel's regression tracker' hat)
--
Everything you wanna know about Linux kernel regression tracking:
https://linux-regtracking.leemhuis.info/about/#tldr
That page also explains what to do if mails like this annoy you.