From: Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Parth Shah <parth@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] sched/idle: Move busy_cpu accounting to idle callback
Date: Mon, 17 May 2021 20:48:46 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d493353-7a27-16aa-3e99-c6a07e69de25@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210517104058.GW2633526@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 5/17/21 6:40 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com> [2021-05-14 12:11:50]:
>
>> On 5/13/21 3:31 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>>> * Aubrey Li <aubrey.li@linux.intel.com> [2021-05-12 16:08:24]:
>>>> On 5/7/21 12:45 AM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> <snip>
>
>>>> Also, for those frequent context-switching tasks with very short idle,
>>>> it's expensive for scheduler to mark idle/busy every time, that's why
>>>> my patch only marks idle every time and marks busy ratelimited in
>>>> scheduler tick.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I have tried few tasks with very short idle times and updating nr_busy
>>> everytime, doesnt seem to be impacting. Infact, it seems to help in picking
>>> the idler-llc more often.
>>>
>>
>> How many CPUs in your LLC?
>
> I have tried with X86, 48 CPUs, 2 nodes, each having 24 CPUs in LLC
> +
> POWER10, Multiple CPUs with 4 CPUs in LLC
> +
> POWER9, Multiple CPUs with 8 CPUs in LLC
>
>>
>> This is a system with 192 CPUs, 4 nodes and each node has 48 CPUs in LLC
>> domain.
>>
>
> Okay,
>
>> It looks like for netperf both TCP and UDP cases have the notable change
>> under 2 x overcommit, it may be not interesting though.
>>
>>
>
> I believe the extra load on this 24 core LLC could be because we may end up
> trying to set the idle-core, even when there is no idle core available.
>
> If possible, can you please give a try with v3 with the call to
> set_next_idle_core commented out?
>
>
v3 seems not be applicable on tip/sched/core 915a2bc3c6b7?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-17 12:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-06 16:45 [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/fair: wake_affine improvements Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 1/8] sched/fair: Update affine statistics when needed Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-07 16:08 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-07 17:05 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-11 11:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-11 16:22 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/8] sched/fair: Maintain the identity of idle-core Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-11 11:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-11 16:27 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 3/8] sched/fair: Update idle-core more often Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 4/8] sched/fair: Prefer idle CPU to cache affinity Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 5/8] sched/fair: Use affine_idler_llc for wakeups across LLC Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] sched/idle: Move busy_cpu accounting to idle callback Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-11 11:51 ` Valentin Schneider
2021-05-11 16:55 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-12 0:32 ` Aubrey Li
2021-05-12 8:08 ` Aubrey Li
2021-05-13 7:31 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-14 4:11 ` Aubrey Li
2021-05-17 10:40 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-17 12:48 ` Aubrey Li [this message]
2021-05-17 12:57 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-18 0:59 ` Aubrey Li
2021-05-18 4:00 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-18 6:05 ` Aubrey Li
2021-05-18 7:18 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-19 9:43 ` Aubrey Li
2021-05-19 17:34 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 7/8] sched/fair: Remove ifdefs in waker_affine_idler_llc Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:45 ` [PATCH v2 8/8] sched/fair: Dont iterate if no idle CPUs Srikar Dronamraju
2021-05-06 16:53 ` [PATCH v2 0/8] sched/fair: wake_affine improvements Srikar Dronamraju
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d493353-7a27-16aa-3e99-c6a07e69de25@linux.intel.com \
--to=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=parth@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).