From: David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>
To: 'Andrew Morton' <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Joe Perches <joe@perches.com>, Andy Whitcroft <apw@canonical.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: check for function calls with struct or union on stack
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2018 10:04:54 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9d7441a14897426f8ed5befe8da0cad3@AcuMS.aculab.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180726122807.fad0566951e36d930edb6874@linux-foundation.org>
From: Andrew Morton
> Sent: 26 July 2018 20:28
> On Thu, 26 Jul 2018 12:25:33 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> > I'll give it a spin, see how noisy it is.
>
> Actually, I would prefer if the message, changelog and title
> used the term "passed by value". It's a more familiar term
> and it is possible for a passed-by-value aggregate to in fact
> be passed in registers.
You need to detect (and ignore) 'small' structures.
Quite a few ABI pass small structures by value in register(s)
or directly on the stack.
So it can make sense to encapsulate an integer value in a
structure in order to get strong typing.
It would, for instance, make sense to do that for user addresses.
David
-
Registered Address Lakeside, Bramley Road, Mount Farm, Milton Keynes, MK1 1PT, UK
Registration No: 1397386 (Wales)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-07-27 10:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-07-26 18:27 [RFC PATCH] checkpatch: check for function calls with struct or union on stack Joe Perches
2018-07-26 19:25 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-26 19:28 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-26 20:05 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-26 20:38 ` Andrew Morton
2018-07-27 10:04 ` David Laight [this message]
2018-07-27 10:08 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-27 10:21 ` David Laight
2018-07-27 10:36 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-28 6:25 ` Julia Lawall
2018-07-28 17:14 ` Joe Perches
2018-07-28 17:24 ` Julia Lawall
2018-07-28 17:20 ` Joe Perches
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9d7441a14897426f8ed5befe8da0cad3@AcuMS.aculab.com \
--to=david.laight@aculab.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=apw@canonical.com \
--cc=joe@perches.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).