[PATCH v4 0/3] J7200: CPSW5G: Add support for QSGMII mode to am65-cpsw driver

[PATCH v4 0/3] J7200: CPSW5G: Add support for QSGMII mode to am65-cpsw driver

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

Add support for QSGMII mode to am65-cpsw driver.

Change log:

v3 -> v4:
1. Update bindings to disallow ports based on compatible, instead of
   adding a new if/then statement for the new compatible.
2. Add Else-If condition for RMII mode in the set of supported interfaces.
   Support for RMII mode is already present in the driver and I had
   missed out adding a condition for RMII mode in the previous patches.

v2 -> v3:
1. In ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml, restrict if/then statement to port
   nodes.

v1 -> v2:
1. Add new compatible for CPSW5G in ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml and extend
   properties for new compatible.
2. Add extra_modes member to struct am65_cpsw_pdata to be used for QSGMII
   mode by new compatible.
3. Add check for phylink supported modes to ensure that only one phy mode
   is advertised as supported.
4. Check if extra_modes supports QSGMII mode in am65_cpsw_nuss_mac_config()
   for register write.
5. Add check for assigning port->sgmii_base only when extra_modes is valid.

v3: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220606110443.30362-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220602114558.6204-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220531113058.23708-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com/

Siddharth Vadapalli (3):
  dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200
    CPSW5G
  net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add support for J7200 CPSW5G
  net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Move phy_set_mode_ext() to correct
    location

 .../bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml   | 17 ++++++-
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c      | 44 ++++++++++++++++---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h      |  2 +
 3 files changed, 54 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

--
2.25.1

[PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

Update bindings for TI K3 J7200 SoC which contains 5 ports (4 external
ports) CPSW5G module and add compatible for it.

Changes made:
    - Add new compatible ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss for CPSW5G.
    - Extend pattern properties for new compatible.
    - Change maximum number of CPSW ports to 4 for new compatible.

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
---
 .../bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml     | 17 +++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
index b8281d8be940..5366a367c387 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ properties:
       - ti,am654-cpsw-nuss
       - ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss
       - ti,am642-cpsw-nuss
+      - ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
 
   reg:
     maxItems: 1
@@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ properties:
         const: 0
 
     patternProperties:
-      port@[1-2]:
+      "^port@[1-4]$":
         type: object
         description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
 
@@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
         properties:
           reg:
             minimum: 1
-            maximum: 2
+            maximum: 4
             description: CPSW port number
 
           phys:
@@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
 
     additionalProperties: false
 
+if:
+  not:
+    properties:
+      compatible:
+        contains:
+          const: ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
+then:
+  properties:
+    ethernet-ports:
+      patternProperties:
+        "^port@[3-4]$": false
+
 patternProperties:
   "^mdio@[0-9a-f]+$":
     type: object
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v4 2/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Add support for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

CPSW5G in J7200 supports additional modes like QSGMII and SGMII.
Add new compatible for J7200 and enable QSGMII mode in am65-cpsw driver.

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++--
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h |  2 ++
 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
index f4a6b590a1e3..033b40649308 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
@@ -74,6 +74,9 @@
 #define AM65_CPSW_PORTN_REG_TS_VLAN_LTYPE_REG	0x318
 #define AM65_CPSW_PORTN_REG_TS_CTL_LTYPE2       0x31C
 
+#define AM65_CPSW_SGMII_CONTROL_REG		0x010
+#define AM65_CPSW_SGMII_CONTROL_MR_AN_ENABLE	BIT(0)
+
 #define AM65_CPSW_CTL_VLAN_AWARE		BIT(1)
 #define AM65_CPSW_CTL_P0_ENABLE			BIT(2)
 #define AM65_CPSW_CTL_P0_TX_CRC_REMOVE		BIT(13)
@@ -1409,7 +1412,14 @@ static const struct net_device_ops am65_cpsw_nuss_netdev_ops = {
 static void am65_cpsw_nuss_mac_config(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
 				      const struct phylink_link_state *state)
 {
-	/* Currently not used */
+	struct am65_cpsw_slave_data *slave = container_of(config, struct am65_cpsw_slave_data,
+							  phylink_config);
+	struct am65_cpsw_port *port = container_of(slave, struct am65_cpsw_port, slave);
+	struct am65_cpsw_common *common = port->common;
+
+	if (common->pdata.extra_modes & BIT(state->interface))
+		writel(AM65_CPSW_SGMII_CONTROL_MR_AN_ENABLE,
+		       port->sgmii_base + AM65_CPSW_SGMII_CONTROL_REG);
 }
 
 static void am65_cpsw_nuss_mac_link_down(struct phylink_config *config, unsigned int mode,
@@ -1847,6 +1857,8 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_init_slave_ports(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
 		port->common = common;
 		port->port_base = common->cpsw_base + AM65_CPSW_NU_PORTS_BASE +
 				  AM65_CPSW_NU_PORTS_OFFSET * (port_id);
+		if (common->pdata.extra_modes)
+			port->sgmii_base = common->ss_base + AM65_CPSW_SGMII_BASE * (port_id);
 		port->stat_base = common->cpsw_base + AM65_CPSW_NU_STATS_BASE +
 				  (AM65_CPSW_NU_STATS_PORT_OFFSET * port_id);
 		port->name = of_get_property(port_np, "label", NULL);
@@ -1981,7 +1993,18 @@ am65_cpsw_nuss_init_port_ndev(struct am65_cpsw_common *common, u32 port_idx)
 	port->slave.phylink_config.type = PHYLINK_NETDEV;
 	port->slave.phylink_config.mac_capabilities = MAC_SYM_PAUSE | MAC_10 | MAC_100 | MAC_1000FD;
 
-	phy_interface_set_rgmii(port->slave.phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+	if (phy_interface_mode_is_rgmii(port->slave.phy_if)) {
+		phy_interface_set_rgmii(port->slave.phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+	} else if (port->slave.phy_if == PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII) {
+		__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_RMII,
+			  port->slave.phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+	} else if (common->pdata.extra_modes & BIT(port->slave.phy_if)) {
+		__set_bit(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_QSGMII,
+			  port->slave.phylink_config.supported_interfaces);
+	} else {
+		dev_err(dev, "selected phy-mode is not supported\n");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
 
 	phylink = phylink_create(&port->slave.phylink_config,
 				 of_node_to_fwnode(port->slave.phy_node),
@@ -2611,10 +2634,18 @@ static const struct am65_cpsw_pdata am64x_cpswxg_pdata = {
 	.fdqring_mode = K3_RINGACC_RING_MODE_RING,
 };
 
+static const struct am65_cpsw_pdata j7200_cpswxg_pdata = {
+	.quirks = 0,
+	.ale_dev_id = "am64-cpswxg",
+	.fdqring_mode = K3_RINGACC_RING_MODE_RING,
+	.extra_modes = BIT(PHY_INTERFACE_MODE_QSGMII),
+};
+
 static const struct of_device_id am65_cpsw_nuss_of_mtable[] = {
 	{ .compatible = "ti,am654-cpsw-nuss", .data = &am65x_sr1_0},
 	{ .compatible = "ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss", .data = &j721e_pdata},
 	{ .compatible = "ti,am642-cpsw-nuss", .data = &am64x_cpswxg_pdata},
+	{ .compatible = "ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss", .data = &j7200_cpswxg_pdata},
 	{ /* sentinel */ },
 };
 MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, am65_cpsw_nuss_of_mtable);
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
index ac945631bf2f..2c9850fdfcb6 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.h
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ struct am65_cpsw_port {
 	const char			*name;
 	u32				port_id;
 	void __iomem			*port_base;
+	void __iomem			*sgmii_base;
 	void __iomem			*stat_base;
 	void __iomem			*fetch_ram_base;
 	bool				disabled;
@@ -88,6 +89,7 @@ struct am65_cpsw_rx_chn {
 
 struct am65_cpsw_pdata {
 	u32	quirks;
+	u64	extra_modes;
 	enum k3_ring_mode fdqring_mode;
 	const char	*ale_dev_id;
 };
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH v4 3/3] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Move phy_set_mode_ext() to correct location

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

In TI's J7200 SoC CPSW5G ports, each of the 4 ports can be configured
as a QSGMII main or QSGMII-SUB port. This configuration is performed
by phy-gmii-sel driver on invoking the phy_set_mode_ext() function.

It is necessary for the QSGMII main port to be configured before any of
the QSGMII-SUB interfaces are brought up. Currently, the QSGMII-SUB
interfaces come up before the QSGMII main port is configured.

Fix this by moving the call to phy_set_mode_ext() from
am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_open() to am65_cpsw_nuss_init_slave_ports(),
thereby ensuring that the QSGMII main port is configured before any of
the QSGMII-SUB ports are brought up.

Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c | 9 ++++-----
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
index 033b40649308..7ef5d8208a4e 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ti/am65-cpsw-nuss.c
@@ -593,11 +593,6 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_ndo_slave_open(struct net_device *ndev)
 	/* mac_sl should be configured via phy-link interface */
 	am65_cpsw_sl_ctl_reset(port);
 
-	ret = phy_set_mode_ext(port->slave.ifphy, PHY_MODE_ETHERNET,
-			       port->slave.phy_if);
-	if (ret)
-		goto error_cleanup;
-
 	ret = phylink_of_phy_connect(port->slave.phylink, port->slave.phy_node, 0);
 	if (ret)
 		goto error_cleanup;
@@ -1898,6 +1893,10 @@ static int am65_cpsw_nuss_init_slave_ports(struct am65_cpsw_common *common)
 			goto of_node_put;
 		}
 
+		ret = phy_set_mode_ext(port->slave.ifphy, PHY_MODE_ETHERNET, port->slave.phy_if);
+		if (ret)
+			goto of_node_put;
+
 		ret = of_get_mac_address(port_np, port->slave.mac_addr);
 		if (ret) {
 			am65_cpsw_am654_get_efuse_macid(port_np,
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 16/08/2022 09:01, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> Update bindings for TI K3 J7200 SoC which contains 5 ports (4 external
> ports) CPSW5G module and add compatible for it.
> 
> Changes made:
>     - Add new compatible ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss for CPSW5G.
>     - Extend pattern properties for new compatible.
>     - Change maximum number of CPSW ports to 4 for new compatible.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
> ---
>  .../bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml     | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> index b8281d8be940..5366a367c387 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ properties:
>        - ti,am654-cpsw-nuss
>        - ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss
>        - ti,am642-cpsw-nuss
> +      - ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss

Keep some order in the list, so maybe before j721e.

>  
>    reg:
>      maxItems: 1
> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ properties:
>          const: 0
>  
>      patternProperties:
> -      port@[1-2]:
> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>          type: object
>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>  
> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>          properties:
>            reg:
>              minimum: 1
> -            maximum: 2
> +            maximum: 4
>              description: CPSW port number
>  
>            phys:
> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>  
>      additionalProperties: false
>  
> +if:

This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false


Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

Hello Krzysztof,

On 16/08/22 13:14, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 16/08/2022 09:01, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Update bindings for TI K3 J7200 SoC which contains 5 ports (4 external
>> ports) CPSW5G module and add compatible for it.
>>
>> Changes made:
>>     - Add new compatible ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss for CPSW5G.
>>     - Extend pattern properties for new compatible.
>>     - Change maximum number of CPSW ports to 4 for new compatible.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Siddharth Vadapalli <s-vadapalli@ti.com>
>> ---
>>  .../bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml     | 17 +++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>> index b8281d8be940..5366a367c387 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/ti,k3-am654-cpsw-nuss.yaml
>> @@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ properties:
>>        - ti,am654-cpsw-nuss
>>        - ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss
>>        - ti,am642-cpsw-nuss
>> +      - ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
> 
> Keep some order in the list, so maybe before j721e.

Thank you for reviewing the patch. I will move ti,j7200-cpswxg-nuss
above ti,j721e-cpsw-nuss in the v5 series.

> 
>>  
>>    reg:
>>      maxItems: 1
>> @@ -110,7 +111,7 @@ properties:
>>          const: 0
>>  
>>      patternProperties:
>> -      port@[1-2]:
>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>          type: object
>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>  
>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>          properties:
>>            reg:
>>              minimum: 1
>> -            maximum: 2
>> +            maximum: 4
>>              description: CPSW port number
>>  
>>            phys:
>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>  
>>      additionalProperties: false
>>  
>> +if:
> 
> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false

allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
additionalProperties:false would be fine.

Regards,
Siddharth.

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 17/08/2022 08:14, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:

>>> -      port@[1-2]:
>>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>>          type: object
>>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>>  
>>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>>          properties:
>>>            reg:
>>>              minimum: 1
>>> -            maximum: 2
>>> +            maximum: 4
>>>              description: CPSW port number
>>>  
>>>            phys:
>>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>>  
>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>  
>>> +if:
>>
>> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false
> 
> allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
> file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
> know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
> additionalProperties:false would be fine.

I think Rob's comment was focusing not on using or not-using allOf, but
on format of your entire if-then-else. Your v3 was huge and included
allOf in wrong place).

Now you add if-then in proper place, but it is still advisable to put it
with allOf, so if ever you grow the if-then by new entry, you do not
have to change the indentation.

Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

Hello Krzysztof,

On 17/08/22 11:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 17/08/2022 08:14, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> 
>>>> -      port@[1-2]:
>>>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>>>          type: object
>>>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>>>  
>>>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>>>          properties:
>>>>            reg:
>>>>              minimum: 1
>>>> -            maximum: 2
>>>> +            maximum: 4
>>>>              description: CPSW port number
>>>>  
>>>>            phys:
>>>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>>>  
>>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>>  
>>>> +if:
>>>
>>> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false
>>
>> allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
>> file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
>> know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
>> additionalProperties:false would be fine.
> 
> I think Rob's comment was focusing not on using or not-using allOf, but
> on format of your entire if-then-else. Your v3 was huge and included
> allOf in wrong place).
> 
> Now you add if-then in proper place, but it is still advisable to put it
> with allOf, so if ever you grow the if-then by new entry, you do not
> have to change the indentation.
> 
> Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
> allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.

I will move the if-then statements to the lines above the
"additionalProperties: false" line. Also, I will add an allOf for this
single if-then statement in the v5 series.

Regards,
Siddharth.

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

Hello Krzysztof,

On 17/08/22 13:11, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 17/08/22 11:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 17/08/2022 08:14, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>>
>>>>> -      port@[1-2]:
>>>>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>>>>          type: object
>>>>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>>>>  
>>>>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>          properties:
>>>>>            reg:
>>>>>              minimum: 1
>>>>> -            maximum: 2
>>>>> +            maximum: 4
>>>>>              description: CPSW port number
>>>>>  
>>>>>            phys:
>>>>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>>>>  
>>>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>>>  
>>>>> +if:
>>>>
>>>> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false
>>>
>>> allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
>>> file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
>>> know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
>>> additionalProperties:false would be fine.
>>
>> I think Rob's comment was focusing not on using or not-using allOf, but
>> on format of your entire if-then-else. Your v3 was huge and included
>> allOf in wrong place).
>>
>> Now you add if-then in proper place, but it is still advisable to put it
>> with allOf, so if ever you grow the if-then by new entry, you do not
>> have to change the indentation.
>>
>> Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
>> allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.
> 
> I will move the if-then statements to the lines above the
> "additionalProperties: false" line. Also, I will add an allOf for this

I had a look at the example at [1] and it uses allOf after the
"additionalProperties: false" line. Would it be fine then for me to add
allOf and the single if-then statement below the "additionalProperties:
false" line? Please let me know.

[1] -> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/mai/test/schemas/conditionals-allof-example.yaml

Regards,
Siddharth.

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

On 19/08/22 15:59, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> Hello Krzysztof,
> 
> On 17/08/22 13:11, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>> Hello Krzysztof,
>>
>> On 17/08/22 11:20, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 17/08/2022 08:14, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
>>>
>>>>>> -      port@[1-2]:
>>>>>> +      "^port@[1-4]$":
>>>>>>          type: object
>>>>>>          description: CPSWxG NUSS external ports
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> @@ -119,7 +120,7 @@ properties:
>>>>>>          properties:
>>>>>>            reg:
>>>>>>              minimum: 1
>>>>>> -            maximum: 2
>>>>>> +            maximum: 4
>>>>>>              description: CPSW port number
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>            phys:
>>>>>> @@ -151,6 +152,18 @@ properties:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>      additionalProperties: false
>>>>>>  
>>>>>> +if:
>>>>>
>>>>> This goes under allOf just before unevaluated/additionalProperties:false
>>>>
>>>> allOf was added by me in v3 series patch and it is not present in the
>>>> file. I removed it in v4 after Rob Herring's suggestion. Please let me
>>>> know if simply moving the if-then statements to the line above
>>>> additionalProperties:false would be fine.
>>>
>>> I think Rob's comment was focusing not on using or not-using allOf, but
>>> on format of your entire if-then-else. Your v3 was huge and included
>>> allOf in wrong place).
>>>
>>> Now you add if-then in proper place, but it is still advisable to put it
>>> with allOf, so if ever you grow the if-then by new entry, you do not
>>> have to change the indentation.
>>>
>>> Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
>>> allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.
>>
>> I will move the if-then statements to the lines above the
>> "additionalProperties: false" line. Also, I will add an allOf for this
> 
> I had a look at the example at [1] and it uses allOf after the
> "additionalProperties: false" line. Would it be fine then for me to add
> allOf and the single if-then statement below the "additionalProperties:
> false" line? Please let me know.
> 
> [1] -> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/mai/test/schemas/conditionals-allof-example.yaml

Sorry, the correct link is:
https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/test/schemas/conditionals-allof-example.yaml

Regards,
Siddharth.

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Krzysztof Kozlowski]

On 19/08/2022 13:43, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:

>>>> Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
>>>> allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.
>>>
>>> I will move the if-then statements to the lines above the
>>> "additionalProperties: false" line. Also, I will add an allOf for this
>>
>> I had a look at the example at [1] and it uses allOf after the
>> "additionalProperties: false" line. Would it be fine then for me to add
>> allOf and the single if-then statement below the "additionalProperties:
>> false" line? Please let me know.
>>
>> [1] -> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/mai/test/schemas/conditionals-allof-example.yaml
> 
> Sorry, the correct link is:
> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/test/schemas/conditionals-allof-example.yaml

You are referring to tests? I did not suggest that. Please put it in
place like example schema is suggesting:

https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/example-schema.yaml

Best regards,
Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v4 1/3] dt-bindings: net: ti: k3-am654-cpsw-nuss: Update bindings for J7200 CPSW5G

[Siddharth Vadapalli]

Hello Krzysztof,

On 19/08/22 17:34, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 19/08/2022 13:43, Siddharth Vadapalli wrote:
> 
>>>>> Anyway the location is not correct. Regardless if this is if-then or
>>>>> allOf-if-then, put it just like example schema is suggesting.
>>>>
>>>> I will move the if-then statements to the lines above the
>>>> "additionalProperties: false" line. Also, I will add an allOf for this
>>>
>>> I had a look at the example at [1] and it uses allOf after the
>>> "additionalProperties: false" line. Would it be fine then for me to add
>>> allOf and the single if-then statement below the "additionalProperties:
>>> false" line? Please let me know.
>>>
>>> [1] -> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/mai/test/schemas/conditionals-allof-example.yaml
>>
>> Sorry, the correct link is:
>> https://github.com/devicetree-org/dt-schema/blob/main/test/schemas/conditionals-allof-example.yaml
> 
> You are referring to tests? I did not suggest that. Please put it in
> place like example schema is suggesting:
> 
> https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v5.19/source/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/example-schema.yaml

Thank you for the clarification. I will follow this schema and add the
allOf and the single if-then statement just above the
"additionalProperties: false" line.

Regards,
Siddharth.