From: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, tiwai@suse.de,
gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
broonie@kernel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org,
jank@cadence.com, slawomir.blauciak@intel.com
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH v2 0/3] soundwire: debugfs support for 5.4
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 06:13:46 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <9f4789b2-66bd-4b17-2b13-934348a18691@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190816094308.GA12733@vkoul-mobl.Dlink>
On 8/16/19 4:43 AM, Vinod Koul wrote:
> On 12-08-19, 18:59, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>> This patchset enables debugfs support and corrects all the feedback
>> provided on an earlier RFC ('soundwire: updates for 5.4')
>>
>> There is one remaining hard-coded value in intel.c that will need to
>> be fixed in a follow-up patchset not specific to debugfs: we need to
>> remove hard-coded Intel-specific configurations from cadence_master.c
>> (PDI offsets, etc).
>>
>> Changes since v1 (Feedback from GKH)
>> Handle debugfs in a more self-contained way (no dentry as return or parameter)
>> Used CONFIG_DEBUG_FS in structures and code to make it easier to
>> remove if need be.
>> No functional change for register dumps.
>>
>> Changes since RFC (Feedback from GKH, Vinod, Guennadi, Cezary, Sanyog):
>> removed error checks
>> used DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE and seq_file
>> fixed copyright dates
>> fixed SPDX license info to use GPL2.0 only
>> fixed Makefile to include debugfs only if CONFIG_DEBUG_FS is selected
>> used static inlines for fallback compilation
>> removed intermediate variables
>> removed hard-coded constants in loops (used registers offsets and
>> hardware capabilities)
>> squashed patch 3
>
> These looks good but failed to apply. Please rebase on soundwire-next
> and resend
Could you do us a favor and make sure your soundwire/fixes branch is
actually merged in soundwire/next? in this case the Makefile is changed
in soundwire/fixes and not in next.
If you use git am --3way things work fine and the conflict is resolved.
Applying: soundwire: add debugfs support
Using index info to reconstruct a base tree...
M drivers/soundwire/Makefile
M include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
Falling back to patching base and 3-way merge...
Auto-merging include/linux/soundwire/sdw.h
Auto-merging drivers/soundwire/Makefile
Applying: soundwire: cadence_master: add debugfs register dump
Applying: soundwire: intel: add debugfs register dump
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-16 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-12 23:59 [PATCH v2 0/3] soundwire: debugfs support for 5.4 Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-12 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] soundwire: add debugfs support Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-12 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] soundwire: cadence_master: add debugfs register dump Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-12 23:59 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] soundwire: intel: " Pierre-Louis Bossart
2019-08-13 6:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] soundwire: debugfs support for 5.4 Greg KH
2019-08-14 6:18 ` [alsa-devel] " Sanyog Kale
2019-08-16 9:43 ` Vinod Koul
2019-08-16 11:13 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=9f4789b2-66bd-4b17-2b13-934348a18691@linux.intel.com \
--to=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=jank@cadence.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=slawomir.blauciak@intel.com \
--cc=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).