linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
To: ivanhu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Colin King <colin.king@canonical.com>,
	fwts-devel@lists.ubuntu.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] efi/efi_test: read RuntimeServicesSupported
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:38:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9feb54b4-447a-12f9-d781-e510623c2aef@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b230c85b-0015-d494-52ef-c6177f923e48@canonical.com>

On 11/30/20 11:38 AM, ivanhu wrote:
>
>
> On 11/30/20 5:17 PM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>> On 11/30/20 9:16 AM, ivanhu wrote:
>>> Hi Heinrich,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the patch.
>>> It looks good to me, but I noticed that the runtime_supported_mask was
>>> introduced after 5.7-rc1.
>>> Maybe we should add the kernel version checking for the old kernels.
>>
>> This is a kernel patch. Why should we check the kernel version in the
>> kernel code?
>>
>> As patches may be back-ported we should not make any assumptions in fwts
>> based on the kernel version. If the ioctl() call fails with errno =
>> ENOTTY, we know that the kernel does not implement the ioctl call and we
>> have to assume that all runtime services are available.
>
> Sounds good to me,
> Acked-by: Ivan Hu <ivan.hu@canonical.com>
>
> And I will replace the reading RuntimeServicesSupported efi variable by
> using efi_test in fwts RuntimeServicesSupported tests.
>
> FWTS will still test those Unsupported Runtime services to check if it
> returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED correctly.
> Is that could solve your problem?
> If I remember correctly, the problem from you is not to test those
> marked Unsupported Runtime services. But from the Spec. 8.1 Runtime
> Services Rules and Restrictions,

The problem I reported was that it is impossible to test UEFI runtime
services on U-Boot because FWTS tries to read the non-existent
RuntimeServicesSupported UEFI variable and mistakenly assumes that if
the variable does not exist none of the runtime services is implemented.

The correct thing to do in FWTS is:

* read RuntimeServicesSupported via the ioctl
* if the ioctl fails assume that all runtime services
   are implemented
* if the ioctl fails with errno != ENOTTY write an error message
* for each runtime service marked as not supported
   check that it returns EFI_UNSUPPORTED
* for each service marked as supported
   check that it works correctly

Best regards

Heinrich

> "
> Note that this is merely a hint to the OS, which it is free to ignore,
> and so the platform is still required to provide callable
> implementations of unsupported runtime services that simply return
> EFI_UNSUPPORTED.
> "
>
> Cheers,
> Ivan
>>
>> Best regards
>>
>> Heinrich
>>
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Ivan
>>>
>>> On 11/28/20 3:20 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
>>>> Since the UEFI 2.8A specification the UEFI enabled firmware provides a
>>>> configuration table EFI_RT_PROPERTIES_TABLE which indicates which
>>>> runtime
>>>> services are enabled. The EFI stub reads this table and saves the
>>>> value of
>>>> the field RuntimeServicesSupported internally.
>>>>
>>>> The Firmware Test Suite requires the value to determine if UEFI runtime
>>>> services are correctly implemented.
>>>>
>>>> With this patch an IOCTL call is provided to read the value of the field
>>>> RuntimeServicesSupported, e.g.
>>>>
>>>>       #define EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK \
>>>>               _IOR('p', 0x0C, unsigned int)
>>>>       unsigned int mask;
>>>>       fd = open("/dev/efi_test", O_RDWR);
>>>>       ret = ioctl(fd, EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK, &mask);
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>
>>>> ---
>>>>    drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
>>>>    drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h |  3 +++
>>>>    2 files changed, 19 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>> b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>> index ddf9eae396fe..47d67bb0a516 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.c
>>>> @@ -663,6 +663,19 @@ static long
>>>> efi_runtime_query_capsulecaps(unsigned long arg)
>>>>        return rv;
>>>>    }
>>>>
>>>> +static long efi_runtime_get_supported_mask(unsigned long arg)
>>>> +{
>>>> +    unsigned int __user *supported_mask;
>>>> +    int rv = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> +    supported_mask = (unsigned int *)arg;
>>>> +
>>>> +    if (put_user(efi.runtime_supported_mask, supported_mask))
>>>> +        rv = -EFAULT;
>>>> +
>>>> +    return rv;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>>    static long efi_test_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
>>>>                                unsigned long arg)
>>>>    {
>>>> @@ -699,6 +712,9 @@ static long efi_test_ioctl(struct file *file,
>>>> unsigned int cmd,
>>>>
>>>>        case EFI_RUNTIME_RESET_SYSTEM:
>>>>            return efi_runtime_reset_system(arg);
>>>> +
>>>> +    case EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK:
>>>> +        return efi_runtime_get_supported_mask(arg);
>>>>        }
>>>>
>>>>        return -ENOTTY;
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>> b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>> index f2446aa1c2e3..117349e57993 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>> +++ b/drivers/firmware/efi/test/efi_test.h
>>>> @@ -118,4 +118,7 @@ struct efi_resetsystem {
>>>>    #define EFI_RUNTIME_RESET_SYSTEM \
>>>>        _IOW('p', 0x0B, struct efi_resetsystem)
>>>>
>>>> +#define EFI_RUNTIME_GET_SUPPORTED_MASK \
>>>> +    _IOR('p', 0x0C, unsigned int)
>>>> +
>>>>    #endif /* _DRIVERS_FIRMWARE_EFI_TEST_H_ */
>>>> --
>>>> 2.29.2
>>>>
>>


  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-27 19:20 [PATCH 1/1] efi/efi_test: read RuntimeServicesSupported Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-11-27 19:28 ` ACK: " Colin Ian King
2020-11-27 19:29   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2020-11-27 19:38     ` Colin Ian King
2020-11-27 19:39     ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-11-30  8:16 ` ivanhu
2020-11-30  9:17   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-11-30 10:38     ` ivanhu
2020-12-02 11:38       ` Heinrich Schuchardt [this message]
2020-12-03  1:20         ` ivanhu
2020-12-03  6:48           ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-12-10 11:49 ` [tip: efi/core] " tip-bot2 for Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-12-26 10:16 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-12-29 13:01   ` Ard Biesheuvel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9feb54b4-447a-12f9-d781-e510623c2aef@gmx.de \
    --to=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=colin.king@canonical.com \
    --cc=fwts-devel@lists.ubuntu.com \
    --cc=ivan.hu@canonical.com \
    --cc=linux-efi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).