From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756194Ab1GGMhw (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 08:37:52 -0400 Received: from sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp ([203.211.202.206]:9057 "EHLO sm-d311v.smileserver.ne.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754557Ab1GGMhv (ORCPT ); Thu, 7 Jul 2011 08:37:51 -0400 Message-ID: From: "Toshiharu Okada" To: "Takashi Iwai" Cc: , , , , , , , References: <1309948067-9333-1-git-send-email-toshiharu-linux@dsn.okisemi.com><34CF59A8D33E40B6822498A23CD554E8@hacdom.okisemi.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add SoundCard driver for OKI SEMICONDUCTOR ML7213 IOH Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2011 21:35:17 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6109 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Date: Thu, 07 Jul 2011 11:00:47 +0200 From: Takashi Iwai >> >> Therefore, I am not considering about ASoC. >> Do I need to fit this driver to an ASoC framework for an upstream? > >Yes, I guess this would be a better choice in your case. Thank you for your comment. >>From now on, We study about ASoC. If there are a document, a website, a driver, etc. which are referred, please tell us. Why is choosing ASoS better? Is it better to correspond to ASoC, when Audio Codec is unfixed? Best Regards Toshiharu Okada