Re: [PATCH 1/4 v3] usb: dwc2: Avoid sleeping while holding hsotg->lock

[John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com>]

> On Jan 16, 2017, at 12:37 PM, John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 2:36 AM, Felipe Balbi
> <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org> writes:
>>> Basically when plugging in various cables in different orders, I'm
>>> occasionally seeing the following BUG splat:
>>> 
>>> [   86.215403] BUG: scheduling while atomic: kworker/u16:2/53/0x00000002
>>> [   86.219164] usb 1-1: USB disconnect, device number 9
>>> [   86.226845] Preemption disabled at:[   86.230218]
>>> [<ffffff8008673558>] dwc2_conn_id_status_change+0x120/0x250
>>> [   86.236894] CPU: 0 PID: 53 Comm: kworker/u16:2 Tainted: G        W
>>>     4.9.0-rc8-00051-gd5a7979-dirty #1702
>>> [   86.246836] Hardware name: HiKey Development Board (DT)
>>> [   86.252100] Workqueue: dwc2 dwc2_conn_id_status_change
>>> [   86.257279] Call trace:
>>> [   86.259771] [<ffffff8008087c28>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1a0
>>> [   86.265210] [<ffffff8008087ddc>] show_stack+0x14/0x20
>>> [   86.270308] [<ffffff80084343f0>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb0
>>> [   86.275401] [<ffffff80080d8d94>] __schedule_bug+0x6c/0xb8
>>> [   86.280841] [<ffffff8008a07220>] __schedule+0x4f8/0x5b0
>>> [   86.286099] [<ffffff8008a073e8>] schedule+0x38/0xa0
>>> [   86.291017] [<ffffff8008a0a6cc>] schedule_hrtimeout_range_clock+0x8c/0xf0
>>> [   86.297846] [<ffffff8008a0a740>] schedule_hrtimeout_range+0x10/0x18
>>> [   86.304150] [<ffffff8008a0a4a0>] usleep_range+0x50/0x58
>>> [   86.309418] [<ffffff800866d8dc>] dwc2_wait_for_mode.isra.4+0x54/0xd0
>>> [   86.315815] [<ffffff800866f058>] dwc2_core_reset+0xe0/0x168
>>> [   86.321431] [<ffffff800867e364>] dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected+0x2c/0x310
>>> [   86.328602] [<ffffff8008673568>] dwc2_conn_id_status_change+0x130/0x250
>>> [   86.335254] [<ffffff80080ccd48>] process_one_work+0x118/0x370
>>> [   86.341035] [<ffffff80080ccfe8>] worker_thread+0x48/0x498
>>> [   86.346473] [<ffffff80080d2eb0>] kthread+0xd0/0xe8
>>> [   86.351299] [<ffffff8008082e80>] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x50
>>> 
>>> This seems to be caused by the dwc2_wait_for_mode() calling
>>> usleep_range() while the hstog->lock spinlock is held, since
>>> we take that before calling dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected().
>>> 
>>> This patch avoids the issue by adding an extra argument to
>>> dwc2_core_reset(), as suggested by John Youn, which allows us to
>>> skip the waiting, which should be unnecessary when calling from
>>> dwc2_hsotg_core_init_disconnected().
>>> 
>>> Cc: Wei Xu <xuwei5@hisilicon.com>
>>> Cc: Guodong Xu <guodong.xu@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@linaro.org>
>>> Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>
>>> Cc: John Youn <johnyoun@synopsys.com>
>>> Cc: Douglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
>>> Cc: Chen Yu <chenyu56@huawei.com>
>>> Cc: Vardan Mikayelyan <mvardan@synopsys.com>
>>> Cc: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@ti.com>
>>> Cc: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@linux.intel.com>
>>> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
>>> Cc: linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
>>> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
>>> ---
>> 
>> doesn't apply to my testing/next. Please rebase
> 
> So these were rebased onto JohnY's tree here:
>  https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_synopsys-2Dusb_linux.git&d=DwIBaQ&c=DPL6_X_6JkXFx7AXWqB0tg&r=U3o8uKoKhWme5_V9D-eeCkB11BFwt4KvWztBgdE9ZpA&m=eBJTBuJyU21iKJvHdy5FxqtxsVARo0iIqJGxMHrlbyQ&s=VIiAT32aG7s04G5NoOOthNdm2JX0eWjJpg62neY_-KI&e=  next
> 
> And apparently have been merged there. I suspect he's going to submit
> his entire tree there to you?
> 
> JohnY: Is this right?


Yeah I'll get these issues sorted out with Felipe. Which may mean resubmitting everything the the proper order.

Thanks,
John