From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S262725AbTLMBHH (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:07:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S262760AbTLMBHH (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:07:07 -0500 Received: from fmr05.intel.com ([134.134.136.6]:22934 "EHLO hermes.jf.intel.com") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S262725AbTLMBHF convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Fri, 12 Dec 2003 20:07:05 -0500 content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6487.1 Subject: RE: [RFC/PATCH] FUSYN 5/10: kernel fuqueues Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:05:25 -0800 Message-ID: X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [RFC/PATCH] FUSYN 5/10: kernel fuqueues Thread-Index: AcPBAXQO/erhjIKJTqSHbrSlHiM5UQAE4fQw From: "Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky" To: "Jamie Lokier" , "Matt Mackall" Cc: , , X-OriginalArrivalTime: 13 Dec 2003 01:05:26.0063 (UTC) FILETIME=[31366BF0:01C3C115] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > From: Jamie Lokier [mailto:jamie@shareable.org] > > Matt Mackall wrote: > > The obvious pronunciation is closer to "fuck you" (fuh-queue or > > fuq-ueue), which is a little more pointed. > > Like the obvious pronunciation of "futex" as "fuh-teks"? Not! > > I say keep the fuqueues as the foo-queues they so beautifully are. Foo like in who-cares-we-are-going-to-blast-it-anyway? }:) Iñaky Pérez-González -- Not speaking for Intel -- all opinions are my own (and my fault)