From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>, Linux MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mm/sparsemem: get physical address to page struct instead of virtual address to pfn
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2020 15:14:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <A25CC0EC-73A0-426D-93A0-DD9DDC43800F@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200209135015.GX8965@MiWiFi-R3L-srv>
> Am 09.02.2020 um 14:50 schrieb Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>:
>
> On 02/07/20 at 11:26am, Wei Yang wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 06, 2020 at 06:19:46PM -0800, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 3:17 PM Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> memmap should be the physical address to page struct instead of virtual
>>>> address to pfn.
>>>>
>>>> Since we call this only for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP, pfn_to_page() is valid at
>>>> this point.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: ba72b4c8cf60 ("mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Wei Yang <richardw.yang@linux.intel.com>
>>>> CC: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> mm/sparse.c | 2 +-
>>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/mm/sparse.c b/mm/sparse.c
>>>> index b5da121bdd6e..56816f653588 100644
>>>> --- a/mm/sparse.c
>>>> +++ b/mm/sparse.c
>>>> @@ -888,7 +888,7 @@ int __meminit sparse_add_section(int nid, unsigned long start_pfn,
>>>> /* Align memmap to section boundary in the subsection case */
>>>> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP) &&
>>>> section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr) != start_pfn)
>>>> - memmap = pfn_to_kaddr(section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr));
>>>> + memmap = pfn_to_page(section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr));
>>>
>>> Yes, this looks obviously correct. This might be tripping up
>>> makedumpfile. Do you see any practical effects of this bug? The kernel
>>> mostly avoids ->section_mem_map in the vmemmap case and in the
>>> !vmemmap case section_nr_to_pfn(section_nr) should always equal
>>> start_pfn.
>>
>> I took another look into the code. Looks there is no practical effect after
>> this. Because in the vmemmap case, we don't need ->section_mem_map to retrieve
>> the real memmap.
>>
>> But leave a inconsistent data in section_mem_map is not a good practice.
>
> Yeah, it does has no pratical effect. I tried to create sub-section
> alighed namespace, then trigger crash, makedumpfile isn't impacted.
> Because pmem memory is only added, but not onlined. We don't report it
> to kdump, makedumpfile will ignore it.
>
> I think it's worth fixing it to encode a correct memmap address. We
> don't know if in the future this will break anything.
We can have system memory and devmem overlap within a section (which is still buggy and to be fixed in other regard - e.g., pfn_to_online_page() does not work correctly).
E.g., 64 mb of (boot) system memory in a section. Then you can hot-add devmem that spans the remaining 64 mb of that section.
So some of that memory will be kdumped - and should be fixed if broken.
Cheers
>
> Thanks
> Baoquan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-09 14:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-06 23:16 [PATCH 0/3] Fixes "mm/sparsemem: support sub-section hotplug" Wei Yang
2020-02-06 23:16 ` [PATCH 1/3] mm/sparsemem: adjust memmap only for SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wei Yang
2020-02-07 2:00 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 11:06 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06 23:16 ` [PATCH 2/3] mm/sparsemem: get physical address to page struct instead of virtual address to pfn Wei Yang
2020-02-07 2:19 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 3:10 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-07 3:21 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 3:36 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-07 4:05 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 11:13 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 12:14 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 16:44 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 10:51 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 11:26 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-09 13:50 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-09 14:14 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2020-02-10 0:36 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-07 4:11 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-07 10:53 ` Wei Yang
2020-02-06 23:16 ` [PATCH 3/3] mm/sparsemem: avoid memmap overwrite for non-SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP Wei Yang
2020-02-07 2:06 ` Dan Williams
2020-02-07 3:50 ` Baoquan He
2020-02-07 11:02 ` Wei Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=A25CC0EC-73A0-426D-93A0-DD9DDC43800F@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=osalvador@suse.de \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=richardw.yang@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).