> On 2 Aug 2018, at 22.50, Matias Bjørling wrote: > > rqd.error is masked by the return value of pblk_submit_io_sync. > The rqd structure is then passed on to the end_io function, which > assumes that any error should lead to a chunk being marked > offline/bad. Since the pblk_submit_io_sync can fail before the > command is issued to the device, the error value maybe not correspond > to a media failure, leading to chunks being immaturely retired. > > Also, the pblk_blk_erase_sync function prints an error message in case > the erase fails. Since the caller prints an error message by itself, > remove the error message in this function. > > Signed-off-by: Matias Bjørling > --- > drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c | 19 ++----------------- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c > index 72acf2f6dbd6..814204d22a2e 100644 > --- a/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c > +++ b/drivers/lightnvm/pblk-core.c > @@ -886,10 +886,8 @@ static void pblk_setup_e_rq(struct pblk *pblk, struct nvm_rq *rqd, > > static int pblk_blk_erase_sync(struct pblk *pblk, struct ppa_addr ppa) > { > - struct nvm_rq rqd; > - int ret = 0; > - > - memset(&rqd, 0, sizeof(struct nvm_rq)); > + struct nvm_rq rqd = {0}; This is a matter of taste, but if you want to squeeze it in here, it is fine by me. There are other places with the same pattern; if you feel strongly about this then please send a patch changing it in all the places. > + int ret; > > pblk_setup_e_rq(pblk, &rqd, ppa); > > @@ -897,19 +895,6 @@ static int pblk_blk_erase_sync(struct pblk *pblk, struct ppa_addr ppa) > * with writes. Thus, there is no need to take the LUN semaphore. > */ > ret = pblk_submit_io_sync(pblk, &rqd); > - if (ret) { > - struct nvm_tgt_dev *dev = pblk->dev; > - struct nvm_geo *geo = &dev->geo; > - > - pblk_err(pblk, "could not sync erase line:%d,blk:%d\n", > - pblk_ppa_to_line(ppa), > - pblk_ppa_to_pos(geo, ppa)); > - > - rqd.error = ret; > - goto out; > - } > - > -out: > rqd.private = pblk; > __pblk_end_io_erase(pblk, &rqd); > > -- > 2.11.0 Otherwise, it looks like a good cleanup. Thanks. Reviewed-by: Javier González