linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Zhang, Yang Z" <yang.z.zhang@intel.com>
To: Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@gmail.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	"gleb@kernel.org" <gleb@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com>,
	Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: nVMX: Enable nested virtualize x2apic mode
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 02:54:13 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AC2E2AF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACzj_yXSy9NwBFWkvN+y=5oZfJTM5AaoLZ08O-G2+hXtZLqH0Q@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8", Size: 7944 bytes --]

Wincy Van wrote on 2015-01-28:
> When L2 is using x2apic, we can use virtualize x2apic mode to gain higher
> performance, especially in apicv case.
> 
> This patch also introduces nested_vmx_check_apicv_controls for the nested
> apicv patches.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Wincy Van <fanwenyi0529@gmail.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c |  114
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>  1 files changed, 112 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c index 787f886..9d11a93
> 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c
> @@ -1108,6 +1108,11 @@ static inline bool nested_cpu_has_xsaves(struct
> vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>                 vmx_xsaves_supported();
>  }
> 
> +static inline bool nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(struct vmcs12
> +*vmcs12) {
> +       return nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12,
> +SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE);
> +}
> +
>  static inline bool is_exception(u32 intr_info)  {
>         return (intr_info & (INTR_INFO_INTR_TYPE_MASK |
> INTR_INFO_VALID_MASK)) @@ -2395,6 +2400,7 @@ static __init void
> nested_vmx_setup_ctls_msrs(void)
>         nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_low = 0;
>         nested_vmx_secondary_ctls_high &=
>                 SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
> +               SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE |
>                 SECONDARY_EXEC_WBINVD_EXITING |
>                 SECONDARY_EXEC_XSAVES;
> 
> @@ -4155,6 +4161,52 @@ static void
> __vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long *msr_bitmap,
>         }
>  }
> 
> +/*
> + * If a msr is allowed by L0, we should check whether it is allowed by L1.
> + * The corresponding bit will be cleared unless both of L0 and L1 allow it.
> + */
> +static void nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(unsigned long
> *msr_bitmap_l1,
> +                                              unsigned long
> *msr_bitmap_nested,
> +                                              u32 msr, int type) {
> +       int f = sizeof(unsigned long);
> +
> +       if (!cpu_has_vmx_msr_bitmap()) {
> +               WARN_ON(1);
> +               return;
> +       }
> +
> +       /*
> +        * See Intel PRM Vol. 3, 20.6.9 (MSR-Bitmap Address). Early manuals
> +        * have the write-low and read-high bitmap offsets the wrong way
> round.
> +        * We can control MSRs 0x00000000-0x00001fff and
> 0xc0000000-0xc0001fff.
> +        */
> +       if (msr <= 0x1fff) {
> +               if (type & MSR_TYPE_R &&
> +                  !test_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_l1 + 0x000 / f))
> +                       /* read-low */
> +                       __clear_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_nested + 0x000 / f);
> +
> +               if (type & MSR_TYPE_W &&
> +                  !test_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_l1 + 0x800 / f))
> +                       /* write-low */
> +                       __clear_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_nested + 0x800 / f);
> +
> +       } else if ((msr >= 0xc0000000) && (msr <= 0xc0001fff)) {
> +               msr &= 0x1fff;
> +               if (type & MSR_TYPE_R &&
> +                  !test_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_l1 + 0x400 / f))
> +                       /* read-high */
> +                       __clear_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_nested + 0x400 / f);
> +
> +               if (type & MSR_TYPE_W &&
> +                  !test_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_l1 + 0xc00 / f))
> +                       /* write-high */
> +                       __clear_bit(msr, msr_bitmap_nested + 0xc00 / f);
> +
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  static void vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(u32 msr, bool longmode_only)  {
>         if (!longmode_only)
> @@ -8350,7 +8402,59 @@ static int
> nested_vmx_check_msr_bitmap_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,  static
> inline bool nested_vmx_merge_msr_bitmap(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>                                                struct vmcs12
> *vmcs12)  {
> -       return false;
> +       struct page *page;
> +       unsigned long *msr_bitmap;
> +
> +       if (!nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(vmcs12))
> +               return false;
> +
> +       page = nested_get_page(vcpu, vmcs12->msr_bitmap);
> +       if (!page) {
> +               WARN_ON(1);
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +       msr_bitmap = (unsigned long *)kmap(page);
> +       if (!msr_bitmap) {
> +               nested_release_page_clean(page);
> +               WARN_ON(1);
> +               return false;
> +       }
> +
> +       if (nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(vmcs12)) {
> +               /* TPR is allowed */
> +               nested_vmx_disable_intercept_for_msr(msr_bitmap,
> +                               vmx_msr_bitmap_nested,
> +                               APIC_BASE_MSR + (APIC_TASKPRI >>
> 4),
> +                               MSR_TYPE_R | MSR_TYPE_W);
> +       } else
> +               __vmx_enable_intercept_for_msr(
> +                               vmx_msr_bitmap_nested,
> +                               APIC_BASE_MSR + (APIC_TASKPRI >>
> 4),
> +                               MSR_TYPE_R | MSR_TYPE_W);
> +       kunmap(page);
> +       nested_release_page_clean(page);
> +
> +       return true;
> +}
> +
> +static int nested_vmx_check_apicv_controls(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> +                                          struct vmcs12 *vmcs12) {
> +       if (!nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(vmcs12))
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       /*
> +        * If virtualize x2apic mode is enabled,
> +        * virtualize apic access must be disabled.
> +        */
> +       if (nested_cpu_has2(vmcs12,
> SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       /* tpr shadow is needed by all apicv features. */
> +       if (!nested_cpu_has(vmcs12, CPU_BASED_TPR_SHADOW))
> +               return -EINVAL;
> +
> +       return 0;
>  }
> 
>  static int nested_vmx_check_msr_switch(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, @@
> -8646,7 +8750,8 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
>                         else
>                                 vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
> 
> page_to_phys(vmx->nested.apic_access_page));
> -               } else if
> (vm_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(vmx->vcpu.kvm)) {
> +               } else if (!(nested_cpu_has_virt_x2apic_mode(vmcs12)) &&
> +
> + (vm_need_virtualize_apic_accesses(vmx->vcpu.kvm))) {
>                         exec_control |=

You don't load L2's apic_page in your patch correctly when x2apic mode is used. Here is the right change for prepare_vmcs02()(maybe other place also need change too):

@@ -8585,7 +8585,8 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
                                CPU_BASED_ACTIVATE_SECONDARY_CONTROLS))
                        exec_control |= vmcs12->secondary_vm_exec_control;
 
-               if (exec_control & SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES) {
+               if (exec_control & (SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
+                                   SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE)) {
                        /*
                         * If translation failed, no matter: This feature asks
                         * to exit when accessing the given address, and if it
@@ -8594,7 +8595,8 @@ static void prepare_vmcs02(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vmcs12 *vmcs12)
                         */
                        if (!vmx->nested.apic_access_page)
                                exec_control &=
-                                 ~SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES;
+                                 ~ (SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES |
+                                    SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_X2APIC_MODE);
                        else
                                vmcs_write64(APIC_ACCESS_ADDR,
                                  page_to_phys(vmx->nested.apic_access_page));


Best regards,
Yang


ÿôèº{.nÇ+‰·Ÿ®‰­†+%ŠËÿ±éݶ\x17¥Šwÿº{.nÇ+‰·¥Š{±þG«éÿŠ{ayº\x1dʇڙë,j\a­¢f£¢·hšïêÿ‘êçz_è®\x03(­éšŽŠÝ¢j"ú\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿ¾\a«þG«éÿ¢¸?™¨è­Ú&£ø§~á¶iO•æ¬z·švØ^\x14\x04\x1a¶^[m§ÿÿÃ\fÿ¶ìÿ¢¸?–I¥

  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-29  2:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-01-28 15:56 [PATCH v4 2/6] KVM: nVMX: Enable nested virtualize x2apic mode Wincy Van
2015-01-29  2:54 ` Zhang, Yang Z [this message]
2015-01-29  3:53   ` Wincy Van
2015-01-29  4:05     ` Zhang, Yang Z

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=A9667DDFB95DB7438FA9D7D576C3D87E0AC2E2AF@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=yang.z.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=fanwenyi0529@gmail.com \
    --cc=gleb@kernel.org \
    --cc=jan.kiszka@web.de \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpeng.li@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).