From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932368Ab0KNXYL (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:24:11 -0500 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:52567 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932312Ab0KNXYJ (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Nov 2010 18:24:09 -0500 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=sqxlXQahARuKxb4+sG4b8Pzf7PLDAlkYTvIvuiB3AXXORsWYkTPMjTpYgTh+ZwTKCb mSry/qks2IyRKIATLwxlEMzct9InuCq2gjoPZUY+GA4J6dLNQ1ma2WtoNfEgQz1Pt7Bm uurV2aLZa4X78t+MZOux2bDmplHptW3bhfh1o= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <4CE05A9E.9090204@redhat.com> References: <4CD6B7FA.3050005@redhat.com> <20101107194547.GA12521@basil.fritz.box> <4CD71C8B.1050604@redhat.com> <20101107230508.GB17592@basil.fritz.box> <20101108145809.GD29714@redhat.com> <1289238930-sup-9765@think> <20101114205925.GA20451@redhat.com> <4CE05A9E.9090204@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 15 Nov 2010 00:24:08 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: dm-crypt barrier support is effective From: Matt To: Milan Broz Cc: Mike Snitzer , Andi Kleen , linux-btrfs , dm-devel , Linux Kernel , htd , Chris Mason Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Nov 14, 2010 at 10:54 PM, Milan Broz wrote: > On 11/14/2010 10:49 PM, Matt wrote: >> only with the dm-crypt scaling patch I could observe the data-corruption > > even with v5 I sent on Friday? > > Are you sure that it is not related to some fs problem in 2.6.37-rc1? > > If it works on 2.6.36 without problems, it is probably problems somewhere > else (flush/fua conversion was trivial here - DM is still doing full flush > and there are no other changes in code IMHO.) > > Milan > Hi Milan, I'm aware of your new v5 patch (which should include several improvements (or potential fixes in my case) over the v3 patch) as I already wrote my schedule unfortunately currently doesn't allow me to test it * in the case of no corruption it would be nice to have 2.6.37-rc* running :) * in the case of data corruption that would mean restoring my system - since it's my production box and right now I don't have a fallback at reach at earliest I could give it a shot at the beginning of December. Then I could also test reiserfs and ext4 as a system partition to rule out that it's a ext4-specific thing (currently I'm running reiserfs on my system-partition). Thanks ! Matt