From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758427Ab1CCQIT (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:08:19 -0500 Received: from smtp1.linux-foundation.org ([140.211.169.13]:35339 "EHLO smtp1.linux-foundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758196Ab1CCQIR (ORCPT ); Thu, 3 Mar 2011 11:08:17 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20110303154706.GA22560@redhat.com> References: <20110302162650.GA26810@redhat.com> <20110302162712.GB26810@redhat.com> <20110303114952.B94B.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com> <20110303154706.GA22560@redhat.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2011 08:07:22 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] exec: introduce get_arg_ptr() helper To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro , Andrew Morton , LKML , linux-mm , pageexec@freemail.hu, Solar Designer , Eugene Teo , Brad Spengler , Roland McGrath , Milton Miller Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 3, 2011 at 7:47 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: >> I _personally_ don't like "conditional". Its name is based on code logic. >> It's unclear what mean "conditional". From data strucuture view, It is >> "opaque userland pointer". > > I agree with any naming, just suggest a better name ;) Maybe just "struct user_arg_ptr" or something? Linus