linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bernd Edlinger <bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>,
	Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Martin Sebor <msebor@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Update -Wattribute-alias for gcc9
Date: Fri, 25 Jan 2019 12:24:49 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM0PR07MB387404F71D25553702966E27E49B0@AM0PR07MB3874.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72=nMYcohMk29fzs3bMut1PXwfqYLZdbRh_AeTN-Z4FpxQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 1/25/19 12:39 PM, Miguel Ojeda wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:58 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 11:43 AM Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Commit bee20031772a ("disable -Wattribute-alias warning for
>>> SYSCALL_DEFINEx()") disabled -Wattribute-alias with gcc8.
>>> gcc9 changed the format of -Wattribute-alias to take a parameter.
>>> This doesn't quite match with the existing disabling mechanism
>>> so update for gcc9 to match with the default (-Wattribute-alias=1).
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@redhat.com>
>>> ---
>>> This is RFC because it feels ugly. I went ahead and did the obvious fixup
>>> but it's worth discussing if we're going to end up with an explosion or
>>> if there's a better way to handle this in one macro.
>>
>> Bernd Edlinger has sent a patch to gcc for this:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-01/msg01120.html
>>
>> and Miguel Ojeda said he wanted to send a patch for it to the
>> kernel as well, not sure if he wanted to take a different
>> approach there, so adding both to Cc here.
> 
> Thanks Arnd (I was working with Martin on the expanded
> -Wmissing-attribute warnings, not on this, but thanks nevertheless :).
> 
> Martin/Bernd: from the GCC mailing list I am not sure if we should
> expect the old behavior to be maintained or not.
> 

I believe it is not intentional to break the old syntax of the
pragma.  There will be new -Wattribute-alias=1 and -Wattribute-alias=2
and -Wattribute-alias is easy to retain as an alias for -Wattribute-alias=1.
That is what my patch will do.


Bernd.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-01-25 12:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-01-25 10:43 [RFC][PATCH] Update -Wattribute-alias for gcc9 Laura Abbott
2019-01-25 10:58 ` Arnd Bergmann
2019-01-25 11:39   ` Miguel Ojeda
2019-01-25 12:24     ` Bernd Edlinger [this message]
2019-01-28 13:28       ` Bernd Edlinger
2019-01-28 14:35         ` Laura Abbott
2019-01-28 14:40         ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=AM0PR07MB387404F71D25553702966E27E49B0@AM0PR07MB3874.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com \
    --to=bernd.edlinger@hotmail.de \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=labbott@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=msebor@gmail.com \
    --cc=yamada.masahiro@socionext.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).