From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753999AbcAXEuV (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:50:21 -0500 Received: from mail-db3on0088.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.55.234.88]:56320 "EHLO emea01-db3-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753406AbcAXEuN convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Jan 2016 23:50:13 -0500 From: Yao Yuan To: Brian Norris , Han Xu CC: Yuan Yao , David Woodhouse , "han.xu@freescale.com" , "linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Thread-Topic: mtd: spi-nor: fsl-quadspi: add support for ls1021a Thread-Index: AQHRVCIJWG0+CSv0t0+sP01krrDc9J8GHGKAgAEcWlCAAJRLgIAB0ZuAgABz0YI= Date: Sun, 24 Jan 2016 04:16:21 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1453362836-44377-1-git-send-email-yao.yuan@freescale.com> ,<20160123211723.GA24744@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20160123211723.GA24744@localhost> Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: authentication-results: spf=none (sender IP is ) smtp.mailfrom=yao.yuan@nxp.com; x-originating-ip: [106.39.222.102] x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1;AM2PR04MB0722;5:W82wHzxUtUBbIfgqkDQjUjxJ7l3Af9Wxd22pEi491/y3bp0KxjIhkqqvmBw1Iz1pe9c33d2C2r2VohhsJxy719AdEYGQZkBZ0yllb9t55uUUfwqQZ2om+nSVQGtAGDZBBVXy4TbbbmPJAdDTtZycrw==;24:cJIiKVNo+PKJ9RBEk/NOAZTWudgr5ub0REwisDLUZvZmvow6itb+NSyrQpM3qgxgz8LXhXXktyyuPI348ajqCRIjFwdvQLDkhRr7y2fXcb8= x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM2PR04MB0722; x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3e9ce011-cda1-4f84-0b94-08d324751d9c x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(185117386973197)(101931422205132); x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:(601004)(2401047)(520078)(8121501046)(5005006)(3002001)(10201501046);SRVR:AM2PR04MB0722;BCL:0;PCL:0;RULEID:;SRVR:AM2PR04MB0722; x-forefront-prvs: 0831C25939 x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM;SFS:(10009020)(6009001)(377454003)(199003)(189002)(24454002)(92566002)(97736004)(40100003)(1220700001)(76576001)(5003600100002)(93886004)(102836003)(2950100001)(586003)(76176999)(106356001)(2900100001)(101416001)(5008740100001)(122556002)(189998001)(3280700001)(1096002)(5004730100002)(6116002)(105586002)(81156007)(87936001)(4326007)(5001770100001)(33656002)(10400500002)(19580395003)(66066001)(50986999)(86362001)(5002640100001)(3846002)(77096005)(2906002)(106116001)(19580405001)(15975445007)(54356999)(11100500001)(74316001)(5001960100002)(7059030);DIR:OUT;SFP:1101;SCL:1;SRVR:AM2PR04MB0722;H:AM2PR04MB0722.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com;FPR:;SPF:None;PTR:InfoNoRecords;A:1;MX:1;LANG:en; spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23 spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7BIT MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginatorOrg: nxp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 24 Jan 2016 04:16:21.2629 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 686ea1d3-bc2b-4c6f-a92c-d99c5c301635 X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM2PR04MB0722 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 05:17 AM +0800, Brian Norris wrote: On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:30:55AM -0600, Han Xu wrote: > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Yao Yuan wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 11:42 PM, Han Xu < xhnjupt@gmail.com > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 1:53 AM, Yuan Yao wrote: > >> > Any extra information you can find them on the patchwork: > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078931/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078951/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8079091/ > >> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/8078941/ > >> > >> Please send all patches in one patch set, this is not acceptable. > >> > > > > Thanks for your review. > > But those patches are dts binding patch. And will send to devicetree@vger.kernel.org and some corresponding maintainer. > > > > Those two patch sets will send to different mail-list and maintainers separately. > > > > So, maybe it's better to send the patch to the maintainer accordingly and thus I think can also reduce the workload of maintainer. > > > > How about your think? > > Send the complete patch set to maintainer and cc all related > sub-module groups, so everybody could understand the whole story. Agreed. You apparently did not read the suggested documentation from last time: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/submitting-patches.txt Particularly, points 2 and 3. Subsystem maintainers merge binding patches, so please send them as part of the regular series. OK, Got it. Thanks Han Xu and Brian Norris. I will resend them as a complete patch set.