linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
@ 2020-10-31 10:54 Yu Kuai
  2020-11-03  1:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2020-11-03 11:23 ` [PATCH V2] " Yu Kuai
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2020-10-31 10:54 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: madalin.bucur, davem, kuba, florinel.iordache
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, yukuai3, yi.zhang

if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c | 14 ++++++++------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
index d9baac0dbc7d..576ce6df3fce 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
@@ -1799,13 +1799,13 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 	of_node_put(fm_node);
 	if (!fm_pdev) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	fman = dev_get_drvdata(&fm_pdev->dev);
 	if (!fman) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	err = of_property_read_u32(port_node, "cell-index", &val);
@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: reading cell-index for %pOF failed\n",
 			__func__, port_node);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 	port_id = (u8)val;
 	port->dts_params.id = port_id;
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 	}  else {
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: Illegal port type\n", __func__);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	port->dts_params.type = port_type;
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 			dev_err(port->dev, "%s: incorrect qman-channel-id\n",
 				__func__);
 			err = -EINVAL;
-			goto return_err;
+			goto put_device;
 		}
 		port->dts_params.qman_channel_id = qman_channel_id;
 	}
@@ -1871,7 +1871,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_address_to_resource() failed\n",
 			__func__);
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	port->dts_params.fman = fman;
@@ -1898,6 +1898,8 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 
 return_err:
 	of_node_put(port_node);
+put_device:
+	put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
 free_port:
 	kfree(port);
 	return err;
-- 
2.25.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-10-31 10:54 [PATCH] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe() Yu Kuai
@ 2020-11-03  1:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
  2020-11-03 11:09   ` yukuai (C)
  2020-11-03 11:23 ` [PATCH V2] " Yu Kuai
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-11-03  1:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu Kuai
  Cc: madalin.bucur, davem, florinel.iordache, netdev, linux-kernel, yi.zhang

On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 18:54:18 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
> corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
> handling for this function implementation.
> 
> Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> index d9baac0dbc7d..576ce6df3fce 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> @@ -1799,13 +1799,13 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>  	of_node_put(fm_node);
>  	if (!fm_pdev) {
>  		err = -EINVAL;
> -		goto return_err;
> +		goto put_device;
>  	}

> @@ -1898,6 +1898,8 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>  
>  return_err:
>  	of_node_put(port_node);
> +put_device:
> +	put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
>  free_port:
>  	kfree(port);
>  	return err;

This does not look right. You're jumping to put_device() when fm_pdev
is NULL? 

The order of error handling should be the reverse of the order of
execution of the function.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-11-03  1:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-03 11:09   ` yukuai (C)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: yukuai (C) @ 2020-11-03 11:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: madalin.bucur, davem, florinel.iordache, netdev, linux-kernel, yi.zhang


On 2020/11/03 9:30, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Oct 2020 18:54:18 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
>> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
>> corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
>> handling for this function implementation.
>>
>> Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
>> index d9baac0dbc7d..576ce6df3fce 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
>> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
>> @@ -1799,13 +1799,13 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>>   	of_node_put(fm_node);
>>   	if (!fm_pdev) {
>>   		err = -EINVAL;
>> -		goto return_err;
>> +		goto put_device;
>>   	}
> 
>> @@ -1898,6 +1898,8 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>>   
>>   return_err:
>>   	of_node_put(port_node);
>> +put_device:
>> +	put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
>>   free_port:
>>   	kfree(port);
>>   	return err;
> 
> This does not look right. You're jumping to put_device() when fm_pdev
> is NULL?
> 
Hi,

oops, it's a silly mistake. Will fix it in V2 patch.

Thanks,
Yu Kuai

> The order of error handling should be the reverse of the order of
> execution of the function.
> .
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V2] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-10-31 10:54 [PATCH] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe() Yu Kuai
  2020-11-03  1:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-03 11:23 ` Yu Kuai
  2020-11-05  1:31   ` Jakub Kicinski
  2020-11-07  9:09   ` [PATCH V3] " Yu Kuai
  1 sibling, 2 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2020-11-03 11:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: madalin.bucur, davem, kuba, florinel.iordache
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, yukuai3, yi.zhang

if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
 .../net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c   | 23 +++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
index d9baac0dbc7d..4ae5d844d1f5 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
@@ -1792,20 +1792,21 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 	if (!fm_node) {
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__);
 		err = -ENODEV;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto free_port;
 	}
 
+	of_node_put(port_node);
 	fm_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(fm_node);
 	of_node_put(fm_node);
 	if (!fm_pdev) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto free_port;
 	}
 
 	fman = dev_get_drvdata(&fm_pdev->dev);
 	if (!fman) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	err = of_property_read_u32(port_node, "cell-index", &val);
@@ -1813,7 +1814,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: reading cell-index for %pOF failed\n",
 			__func__, port_node);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 	port_id = (u8)val;
 	port->dts_params.id = port_id;
@@ -1847,7 +1848,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 	}  else {
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: Illegal port type\n", __func__);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	port->dts_params.type = port_type;
@@ -1861,7 +1862,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 			dev_err(port->dev, "%s: incorrect qman-channel-id\n",
 				__func__);
 			err = -EINVAL;
-			goto return_err;
+			goto put_device;
 		}
 		port->dts_params.qman_channel_id = qman_channel_id;
 	}
@@ -1871,20 +1872,18 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_address_to_resource() failed\n",
 			__func__);
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	port->dts_params.fman = fman;
 
-	of_node_put(port_node);
-
 	dev_res = __devm_request_region(port->dev, &res, res.start,
 					resource_size(&res), "fman-port");
 	if (!dev_res) {
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: __devm_request_region() failed\n",
 			__func__);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto free_port;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	port->dts_params.base_addr = devm_ioremap(port->dev, res.start,
@@ -1896,8 +1895,8 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 
 	return 0;
 
-return_err:
-	of_node_put(port_node);
+put_device:
+	put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
 free_port:
 	kfree(port);
 	return err;
-- 
2.25.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V2] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-11-03 11:23 ` [PATCH V2] " Yu Kuai
@ 2020-11-05  1:31   ` Jakub Kicinski
  2020-11-06 21:59     ` Madalin Bucur (OSS)
  2020-11-07  9:09   ` [PATCH V3] " Yu Kuai
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-11-05  1:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu Kuai
  Cc: madalin.bucur, davem, florinel.iordache, netdev, linux-kernel, yi.zhang

On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:23:23 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> @@ -1792,20 +1792,21 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>  	if (!fm_node) {
>  		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__);
>  		err = -ENODEV;
> -		goto return_err;
> +		goto free_port;
>  	}
>  
> +	of_node_put(port_node);
>  	fm_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(fm_node);
>  	of_node_put(fm_node);
>  	if (!fm_pdev) {
>  		err = -EINVAL;
> -		goto return_err;
> +		goto free_port;
>  	}

This is not right either. I just asked you fix up the order of the
error path, not move the of_node_put() in the body of the function. 

Now you're releasing the reference on the object and still use it after.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* RE: [PATCH V2] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-11-05  1:31   ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-06 21:59     ` Madalin Bucur (OSS)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: Madalin Bucur (OSS) @ 2020-11-06 21:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu Kuai
  Cc: Jakub Kicinski, davem, Florinel Iordache, netdev, linux-kernel, yi.zhang

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
> Sent: 05 November 2020 03:31
> To: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> Cc: Madalin Bucur <madalin.bucur@nxp.com>; davem@davemloft.net; Florinel
> Iordache <florinel.iordache@nxp.com>; netdev@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> kernel@vger.kernel.org; yi.zhang@huawei.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in
> fman_port_probe()
> 
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2020 19:23:23 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
> > @@ -1792,20 +1792,21 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct
> platform_device *of_dev)
> >  	if (!fm_node) {
> >  		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__);
> >  		err = -ENODEV;
> > -		goto return_err;
> > +		goto free_port;
> >  	}
> >
> > +	of_node_put(port_node);
> >  	fm_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(fm_node);
> >  	of_node_put(fm_node);
> >  	if (!fm_pdev) {
> >  		err = -EINVAL;
> > -		goto return_err;
> > +		goto free_port;
> >  	}
> 
> This is not right either. I just asked you fix up the order of the
> error path, not move the of_node_put() in the body of the function.
> 
> Now you're releasing the reference on the object and still use it after.

If you manage to put together a v3, please also address the typo in the
subject (put_devcie).

Madalin

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* [PATCH V3] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-11-03 11:23 ` [PATCH V2] " Yu Kuai
  2020-11-05  1:31   ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-07  9:09   ` Yu Kuai
  2020-11-07 22:09     ` Jakub Kicinski
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Yu Kuai @ 2020-11-07  9:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: madalin.bucur, davem, kuba, florinel.iordache
  Cc: netdev, linux-kernel, yukuai3, yi.zhang

if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
handling for this function implementation.

Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
---
Changes in V3:
 - move of_node_put(port_node) backward, so that error handling can be the
 reverse of the order of execution.
 - rename retur_err to put_node

 .../net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c   | 23 ++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
index d9baac0dbc7d..9790e483241b 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/freescale/fman/fman_port.c
@@ -1792,20 +1792,20 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 	if (!fm_node) {
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__);
 		err = -ENODEV;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto free_port;
 	}
 
 	fm_pdev = of_find_device_by_node(fm_node);
 	of_node_put(fm_node);
 	if (!fm_pdev) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_node;
 	}
 
 	fman = dev_get_drvdata(&fm_pdev->dev);
 	if (!fman) {
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	err = of_property_read_u32(port_node, "cell-index", &val);
@@ -1813,7 +1813,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: reading cell-index for %pOF failed\n",
 			__func__, port_node);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 	port_id = (u8)val;
 	port->dts_params.id = port_id;
@@ -1847,7 +1847,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 	}  else {
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: Illegal port type\n", __func__);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	port->dts_params.type = port_type;
@@ -1861,7 +1861,7 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 			dev_err(port->dev, "%s: incorrect qman-channel-id\n",
 				__func__);
 			err = -EINVAL;
-			goto return_err;
+			goto put_device;
 		}
 		port->dts_params.qman_channel_id = qman_channel_id;
 	}
@@ -1871,22 +1871,21 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_address_to_resource() failed\n",
 			__func__);
 		err = -ENOMEM;
-		goto return_err;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
 	port->dts_params.fman = fman;
 
-	of_node_put(port_node);
-
 	dev_res = __devm_request_region(port->dev, &res, res.start,
 					resource_size(&res), "fman-port");
 	if (!dev_res) {
 		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: __devm_request_region() failed\n",
 			__func__);
 		err = -EINVAL;
-		goto free_port;
+		goto put_device;
 	}
 
+	of_node_put(port_node);
 	port->dts_params.base_addr = devm_ioremap(port->dev, res.start,
 						  resource_size(&res));
 	if (!port->dts_params.base_addr)
@@ -1896,7 +1895,9 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
 
 	return 0;
 
-return_err:
+put_device:
+	put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
+put_node:
 	of_node_put(port_node);
 free_port:
 	kfree(port);
-- 
2.25.4


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-11-07  9:09   ` [PATCH V3] " Yu Kuai
@ 2020-11-07 22:09     ` Jakub Kicinski
  2020-11-09 13:11       ` yukuai (C)
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 9+ messages in thread
From: Jakub Kicinski @ 2020-11-07 22:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Yu Kuai
  Cc: madalin.bucur, davem, florinel.iordache, netdev, linux-kernel, yi.zhang

On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:09:25 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
> corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
> handling for this function implementation.
> 
> Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>

> @@ -1792,20 +1792,20 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>  	if (!fm_node) {
>  		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__);
>  		err = -ENODEV;
> -		goto return_err;
> +		goto free_port;

And now you no longer put port_node if jumping from here...

Also does the reference to put_device() not have to be released when
this function succeeds?

>  	}

> @@ -1896,7 +1895,9 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>  
>  	return 0;
>  
> -return_err:
> +put_device:
> +	put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
> +put_node:
>  	of_node_put(port_node);
>  free_port:
>  	kfree(port);


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH V3] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe()
  2020-11-07 22:09     ` Jakub Kicinski
@ 2020-11-09 13:11       ` yukuai (C)
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 9+ messages in thread
From: yukuai (C) @ 2020-11-09 13:11 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Jakub Kicinski
  Cc: madalin.bucur, davem, florinel.iordache, netdev, linux-kernel, yi.zhang

在 2020/11/08 6:09, Jakub Kicinski 写道:
> On Sat, 7 Nov 2020 17:09:25 +0800 Yu Kuai wrote:
>> if of_find_device_by_node() succeed, fman_port_probe() doesn't have a
>> corresponding put_device(). Thus add jump target to fix the exception
>> handling for this function implementation.
>>
>> Fixes: 0572054617f3 ("fsl/fman: fix dereference null return value")
>> Signed-off-by: Yu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
> 
>> @@ -1792,20 +1792,20 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>>   	if (!fm_node) {
>>   		dev_err(port->dev, "%s: of_get_parent() failed\n", __func__);
>>   		err = -ENODEV;
>> -		goto return_err;
>> +		goto free_port;
> 
> And now you no longer put port_node if jumping from here...

Sincerely apologize for that stupid mistake...

> 
> Also does the reference to put_device() not have to be released when
> this function succeeds?
> 

I'm not sure about that, since fman_port_driver doesn't define other
interface, maybe it reasonable to release it here.

>>   	}
> 
>> @@ -1896,7 +1895,9 @@ static int fman_port_probe(struct platform_device *of_dev)
>>   
>>   	return 0;
>>   
>> -return_err:
>> +put_device:
>> +	put_device(&fm_pdev->dev);
>> +put_node:
>>   	of_node_put(port_node);
>>   free_port:
>>   	kfree(port);
> 
> .
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 9+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2020-11-09 13:11 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-10-31 10:54 [PATCH] fsl/fman: add missing put_devcie() call in fman_port_probe() Yu Kuai
2020-11-03  1:30 ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-03 11:09   ` yukuai (C)
2020-11-03 11:23 ` [PATCH V2] " Yu Kuai
2020-11-05  1:31   ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-06 21:59     ` Madalin Bucur (OSS)
2020-11-07  9:09   ` [PATCH V3] " Yu Kuai
2020-11-07 22:09     ` Jakub Kicinski
2020-11-09 13:11       ` yukuai (C)

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).