From: Justin He <Justin.He@arm.com>
To: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Eric Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>,
"Ahmed S. Darwish" <a.darwish@linutronix.de>,
"linux-doc@vger.kernel.org" <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>, nd <nd@arm.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 1/5] d_path: fix Kernel doc validator complaints
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2021 00:49:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <AM6PR08MB4376D2F3D2AB31C51260F1EDF7B59@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9bb23730-3c1e-4144-2955-99dccacf010f@infradead.org>
Hi Randy
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 7, 2021 5:39 AM
> To: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; Justin He
> <Justin.He@arm.com>
> Cc: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>; Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>;
> Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@chromium.org>; Rasmus Villemoes
> <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>; Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>; Alexander
> Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>; Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-
> foundation.org>; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>; Eric
> Biggers <ebiggers@google.com>; Ahmed S. Darwish <a.darwish@linutronix.de>;
> linux-doc@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-
> fsdevel@vger.kernel.org; Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>; Christoph
> Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>; nd <nd@arm.com>; Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-
> foundation.org>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 1/5] d_path: fix Kernel doc validator complaints
>
> On 9/26/21 3:57 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On 7/15/21 3:34 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 09:14:03AM +0800, Jia He wrote:
> >>> Kernel doc validator complains:
> >>> Function parameter or member 'p' not described in 'prepend_name'
> >>> Excess function parameter 'buffer' description in 'prepend_name'
> >>
> >> Yup!
> >> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> >>
> >
> > Acked-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> >
> > Can we get someone to merge this, please?
>
> Ho hum. Justin, please resubmit your patch with Andy's Reviewed-by:
> and my Acked-by:. Send it to Andrew Morton and ask him to merge it.
>
> Thanks.
Okay, I will send this [patch 1/5] separately.
--
Cheers,
Justin (Jia He)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-11 0:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-15 1:14 [PATCH v7 0/5] make '%pD' print the full path of file Jia He
2021-07-15 1:14 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] d_path: fix Kernel doc validator complaints Jia He
2021-07-15 10:34 ` Andy Shevchenko
2021-09-26 22:57 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-10-06 21:38 ` Randy Dunlap
2021-10-11 0:49 ` Justin He [this message]
2021-07-15 1:14 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] d_path: introduce helper d_path_unsafe() Jia He
2021-07-15 1:14 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] lib/vsprintf.c: make '%pD' print the full path of file Jia He
2021-07-21 13:55 ` Petr Mladek
2021-07-15 1:14 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] lib/test_printf.c: split write-beyond-buffer check in two Jia He
2021-07-15 1:14 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] lib/test_printf.c: add test cases for '%pD' Jia He
2021-07-21 14:06 ` Petr Mladek
2021-07-21 14:11 ` [PATCH v7 0/5] make '%pD' print the full path of file Petr Mladek
2021-08-05 0:39 ` Justin He
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=AM6PR08MB4376D2F3D2AB31C51260F1EDF7B59@AM6PR08MB4376.eurprd08.prod.outlook.com \
--to=justin.he@arm.com \
--cc=a.darwish@linutronix.de \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=ebiggers@google.com \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=nd@arm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pmladek@suse.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=senozhatsky@chromium.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).