From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB141C3A59F for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 04:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE54523426 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 04:58:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726251AbfHaE6D convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 00:58:03 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:7244 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725298AbfHaE6C (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 00:58:02 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098416.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x7V4v2Nn038830 for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 00:58:01 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2uqc4ph5jq-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 00:58:01 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 05:57:59 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.198) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Sat, 31 Aug 2019 05:57:56 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps4076.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x7V4vtbb18022426 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 04:57:55 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBE674203F; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 04:57:54 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFD6A42041; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 04:57:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.85.86.104] (unknown [9.85.86.104]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 04:57:53 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.11\)) Subject: Re: Oops (request_key_auth_describe) while running cve-2016-7042 from LTP From: Sachin Sant In-Reply-To: <11986.1567178014@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 10:27:52 +0530 Cc: Hillf Danton , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT References: <85B7196E-D717-4F19-A7E8-82A18287A3DE@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <11986.1567178014@warthog.procyon.org.uk> To: David Howells X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.11) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19083104-0008-0000-0000-0000030F3A30 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19083104-0009-0000-0000-00004A2D8338 Message-Id: X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-08-31_02:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=882 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1906280000 definitions=main-1908310055 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > On 30-Aug-2019, at 8:43 PM, David Howells wrote: > > Can you try this patch instead of Hillf’s? Works for me. Test ran fine without any problem. Tested-by: Sachin Sant Thanks -Sachin