From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:35:24 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:35:14 -0400 Received: from ibis.worldnet.net ([195.3.3.14]:54795 "EHLO ibis.worldnet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 13:35:07 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 19:33:14 +0200 Subject: Re: temperature standard - global config option? From: Chris Boot To: "Michael H. Warfield" , mirabilos {Thorsten Glaser} CC: "L. K." , "Albert D. Cahalan" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20010607212138.B29121@alcove.wittsend.com> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > Then you must have blown your quantum finals. Royally. ESPECIALLY > after that statement about "temperature is nothing but the movement of > pieces of materie". Not even close, once you get into the quant. > > Mathematically and quantum mechanically, negative absolute > temperatures do exist. In quantum mechanics, temperature is expressed as > probability populations in various quantum states. Excuse me, but I don't think that we can get computer temperature sensors as we know them to measure temperatures of matter in quantum states. Even if, one day, we built a usable quantum computer which might need temperature measurements, I doubt that the Linux kernel would run on it without being totally rewritten. Anyhow, I like the discussion. I love anything to do with quantum physics! -- Chris Boot bootc@worldnet.fr #define QUESTION ((2b) || (!2b))