From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:29:34 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id ; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:29:24 -0400 Received: from ibis.worldnet.net ([195.3.3.14]:30219 "EHLO ibis.worldnet.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id convert rfc822-to-8bit; Fri, 8 Jun 2001 17:29:10 -0400 User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022 Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001 23:28:25 +0200 Subject: Re: temperature standard - global config option? From: Chris Boot To: "Albert D. Cahalan" , "Michael H. Warfield" CC: mirabilos {Thorsten Glaser} , "L. K." , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <200106082116.f58LGd2497562@saturn.cs.uml.edu> Mime-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, > Only the truly stupid would assume accuracy from decimal places. Well then, tell all the teachers in this world that they're stupid, and tell everyone who learnt from them as well. I'm in high school (gd. 11, junior) and my physics teacher is always screaming at us for putting too many decimal places or having them inconsistent. There are certain situations where adding a ±1 is too cumbersome and / or clumsy, so you can specify the accuracy using just decimal places. For example, 5.00 would mean pretty much spot on 5 (anywhere from 4.995 to 5.00499), wheras 5 could mean anywhere from 4.5 to 5.499. Please, let's quit this dumb argument. We all know that thermistors and other types of cheap temperature gauges are very inaccurate, and I don't think expensive thermocouples will make it into computer sensors very soon. Plus, who the hell could care whether their chip is at 45.4 or 45.5 degrees? Does it really matter? A difference of 0.1 will not decide whether your chip will fry. Just my 2 eurocents. -- Chris Boot bootc@worldnet.fr DOS Computers manufactured by companies such as IBM, Compaq, Tandy, and millions of others are by far the most popular, with about 70 million machines in use worldwide. Macintosh fans, on the other hand, may note that cockroaches are far more numerous than humans, and that numbers alone do not denote a higher life form. New York Times, November 26, 1991