From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>
To: "Russell King" <rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk>,
"Geert Uytterhoeven" <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "Chen, Kenneth W" <kenneth.w.chen@intel.com>,
"Christoph Hellwig" <hch@infradead.org>,
"Akinobu Mita" <mita@miraclelinux.com>,
"Grant Grundler" <iod00d@hp.com>,
"Linux Kernel Development" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/12] generic *_bit()
Date: Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:07:47 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F059C0E92@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
> > Intel doesn't care about big endian (cfr. your lkml back issues of January
> > 2006).
>
> Incorrect. Intel does actually produce big endian CPUs - most of the
> Intel IXP (ARM based) stuff is big endian. It just depends which part
> of Intel you're referring to.
Set PSR.be (and DCR.be) to 1 and ia64 becomes a big-endian cpu (which,
IIRC, how HP-UX uses it).
-Tony
next reply other threads:[~2006-02-03 17:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-02-03 17:07 Luck, Tony [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2006-01-25 11:26 [PATCH 0/6] RFC: use include/asm-generic/bitops.h Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 11:32 ` [PATCH 3/6] C-language equivalents of include/asm-*/bitops.h Akinobu Mita
2006-01-25 20:02 ` Russell King
2006-01-25 20:59 ` Grant Grundler
2006-01-26 3:27 ` Akinobu Mita
2006-01-26 3:29 ` [PATCH 1/12] generic *_bit() Akinobu Mita
2006-02-01 15:11 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-01 18:02 ` Christoph Hellwig
2006-02-01 18:07 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-01 19:19 ` Russell King
2006-02-01 19:25 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-01 19:35 ` Russell King
2006-02-03 10:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2006-02-03 10:27 ` Russell King
2006-02-01 19:39 ` Grant Grundler
2006-02-01 21:41 ` Chen, Kenneth W
2006-02-01 22:09 ` Grant Grundler
2006-02-01 22:49 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-02-02 0:08 ` Grant Grundler
2006-02-02 8:52 ` Anton Altaparmakov
2006-02-02 10:13 ` Andreas Schwab
2006-02-02 22:43 ` Paul Mackerras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=B8E391BBE9FE384DAA4C5C003888BE6F059C0E92@scsmsx401.amr.corp.intel.com \
--to=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=hch@infradead.org \
--cc=iod00d@hp.com \
--cc=kenneth.w.chen@intel.com \
--cc=linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mita@miraclelinux.com \
--cc=rmk+lkml@arm.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).