From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756190Ab1EXRLG (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 13:11:06 -0400 Received: from mail-fx0-f46.google.com ([209.85.161.46]:50246 "EHLO mail-fx0-f46.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752153Ab1EXRLE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 24 May 2011 13:11:04 -0400 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=CEGxcCGSE3pu+FCYpRyTwKR08j2KhOku4Y5nIhj1+7Bh4zvvlzAAq5AkxIfIaq6XfI dEvhAOL7KOK1ZYSzATJMogKHgPe6pCel0SsOxp/rbExam2IoMRIxPgKYFPrhvWgYxmvT vocNoBjZMyUYlY4YD/sMQXRJNjaFoCQHdIZL0= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <20110520161816.dda6f1fd.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> From: Mike Frysinger Date: Tue, 24 May 2011 13:10:42 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the final tree To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Andrew Morton , Mel Gorman , linux-mm@kvack.org, Alexander Viro , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" , Dipankar Sarma , "Balbi, Felipe" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:10, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 00:01, Linus Torvalds wrote: >> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:06 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: >>> >>> more failures: >> >> Is this blackfin or something? > > let's go with "something" ... > >> I did an allyesconfig with a special x86 patch that should have caught >> everything that didn't have the proper prefetch.h include, but non-x86 >> drivers would have passed that. > > the isp1362-hcd failure probably is before your > 268bb0ce3e87872cb9290c322b0d35bce230d88f.  i think i was reading a log > that is a few days old (ive been traveling and am playing catch up > atm).  i'll refresh and see what's what still. > > the common musb code only allows it to be built if the arch glue is > available, and there is no x86 glue.  so an allyesconfig on x86 > wouldnt have picked up the failure.  it'll bomb though for any target > which does have the glue. latest tree seems to only fail for me now on the musb driver. i can send out a patch later today if no one else has gotten to it yet. -mike