From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752770AbdDLDWO (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:22:14 -0400 Received: from mga07.intel.com ([134.134.136.100]:34052 "EHLO mga07.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752369AbdDLDWL (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:22:11 -0400 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.37,188,1488873600"; d="scan'208";a="1154635306" From: "Wu, Hao" To: Alan Tull , Moritz Fischer CC: "matthew.gerlach@linux.intel.com" , Moritz Fischer , "linux-fpga@vger.kernel.org" , linux-kernel , "Kang, Luwei" , "Zhang, Yi Z" , "Luebbers, Enno" , Xiao Guangrong Subject: RE: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview Thread-Topic: [PATCH 01/16] docs: fpga: add a document for Intel FPGA driver overview Thread-Index: AQHSqkwX8JSdU5lhCUCMCs2fI0o4PKGuwSsAgANoxl+ADdbSAIABIdsA Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2017 03:22:05 +0000 Message-ID: References: <1490875696-15145-1-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <1490875696-15145-2-git-send-email-hao.wu@intel.com> <20170401111619.GB4804@hao-dev> <20170402144146.GA30775@tyrael.amer.corp.natinst.com> In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: dlp-product: dlpe-windows dlp-version: 10.0.102.7 dlp-reaction: no-action x-originating-ip: [10.239.127.40] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from base64 to 8bit by mail.home.local id v3C3MJ20013942 > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > Does this HW Architecture require an Intel FPGA? Couldn't any vendors > FPGA > >> > > be used as long as it presented itself the PCIe bus the same and contained > >> > > an appropriate Device Feature List? > > > > I think this is a good (and important) point. Especially when sysfs > > entries & ioctls constituting ABI depend on it. > > Please cc linux-api@vger.kernel.org on your next version of this as > linux/Documentation/process/adding-syscalls.rst specifies for new system calls. > Sure, will cc linux-api@vger.kernel.org on the next version patch set. Thanks Hao