> -----Original Message----- > From: Lan, Tianyu > Sent: Thursday, February 28, 2013 4:37 PM > To: Li, Fei; stern@rowland.harvard.edu > Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org; sarah.a.sharp@linux.intel.com; rjw@sisk.pl; > linux-usb@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Liu, Chuansheng > Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] usb: call pm_runtime_put_sync in > pm_runtime_get_sync failed case > > On 2013年02月28日 15:57, Li Fei wrote: > > > > Even in failed case of pm_runtime_get_sync, the usage_count > > is incremented. In order to keep the usage_count with correct > > value and runtime power management to behave correctly, call > > pm_runtime_put(_sync) in such case. > > Hi Fei: > It's not necessary. Because the did_runtime_put == true means the > port's usage count has already been decreased during > usb_port_suspend().So to keep usage count balance, we should increase > the usage count in the usb_port_resume() whatever. Thanks for your reminder. Sorry, I forget to keep did_runtime_put as false in pm_runtime_get_sync failed case. I'll submit patch V2 to update it. > > > > Signed-off-by Liu Chuansheng > > Signed-off-by: Li Fei > > --- > > drivers/usb/core/hub.c | 1 + > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > > index 5480352..b68493b 100644 > > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > > @@ -3152,6 +3152,7 @@ int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev, > pm_message_t msg) > > if (status < 0) { > > dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "can't resume usb port, status %d\n", > > status); > > + pm_runtime_put_sync(&port_dev->dev); > > return status; > > } > > } > > > Hi Alan: > Further thinking, the device should be disconnected since the port > can't be resumed and the device will not work normally. Something like > following. Does this make sense? > --- > diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > index d5d3de4..cf36b11 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hub.c > @@ -3170,6 +3170,7 @@ int usb_port_resume(struct usb_device *udev, > pm_message_t msg) > if (status < 0) { > dev_dbg(&udev->dev, "can't resume usb port, > status %d\n", > status); > + hub_port_logical_disconnect(hub, port1); IMHO, this can't keep the usage_count balance. Best Regards, Li Fei > return status; > } > } > > > -- > Best regards > Tianyu Lan {.n++%ݶw{.n+{G{ayʇڙ,jfhz_(階ݢj"mG?&~iOzv^m ?I