linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com>,
	hpa@zytor.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com,
	bp@alien8.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86_64: uninline TASK_SIZE
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 07:30:40 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <BFD71398-0BDC-4045-91E9-C70A22FF6E73@amacapital.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190422103449.GA75723@gmail.com>



> On Apr 22, 2019, at 3:34 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> 
> * Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>>>>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/task_size_64.c
>>>>> @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
>>>>> +#include <linux/export.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>>>>> +#include <linux/thread_info.h>
>>>>> +
>>>>> +unsigned long _task_size(void)
>>>>> +{
>>>>> +    return test_thread_flag(TIF_ADDR32) ? IA32_PAGE_OFFSET :
>>>> TASK_SIZE_MAX;
>>>>> +}
>>>>> +EXPORT_SYMBOL(_task_size);
>>>> 
>>>> Good idea - but instead of adding yet another compilation unit, why not
>>>> 
>>>> stick _task_size() into arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c, which is the 
>>>> canonical place for process management related arch functions?
>>>> 
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> 
>>>>    Ingo
>>> 
>>> Better yet... since TIF_ADDR32 isn't something that changes randomly, 
>>> perhaps this should be a separate variable?
>> 
>> Maybe. I only thought about putting every 32-bit related flag under 
>> CONFIG_COMPAT to further eradicate bloat (and force everyone else to 
>> keep an eye on it, ha-ha).
> 
> Basically TIF_ADDR32 is only set for a task if set_personality_ia32() is 
> called, which function is called in the following circumstances:
> 
> - arch/x86/ia32/ia32_aout.c:load_aout_binary()
> 
>   This is in exec(), when a new binary is loaded for the current task, 
>   via search_binary_handler() and exec_binprm(). Ordering is 
>   synchronous, AFAICS there can be no race between TASK_SIZE users and 
>   the set_personality_ia32() call which is always for the current task.
> 
> - in COMPAT_SET_PERSONALITY(), which through macro detours ends up being 
>   in SET_PERSONALITY2(), which is used in fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c's 
>   load_elf_binary(), used in a similar fashion in exec() as the AOUT 
>   case above. One particular macro detour of note is that 
>   fs/compat_binfmt_elf.c #includes fs/binfmt_elf.c and re-defines the 
>   personality setting method to map to set_personality_ia32().
> 
> When set_personality_ia32() is called then TIF_ADDR32 is set 
> unconditionally, without any Kconfig variations.
> 
> TIF_ADDR32 is cleared:
> 
> - In set_personality_64bit(), when a 64-bit binary is loaded via 
>   fs/binfmt_elf.c.
> 
> - It also defaults to clear in the init task, which is inherited by the 
>   initial kernel threads and any user-space task they might end up 
>   executing.
> 
> So the conclusion is that IMO we can safely put TASK_SIZE into a new 
> thread_info()->task_size field, and:
> 
> - change ->task_size to the 32-bit address space in 
>   set_personality_ia32()
> 
> - change ->task_size to teh 64-bit address space in the init task and in 
>   set_personality_64bit().
> 
> This should cover it I think, unless I missed something.
> 

Are there really enough TASK_SIZE users to justify any of this?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-04-22 14:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-04-21 16:06 Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-21 18:28 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-21 20:07   ` hpa
2019-04-21 21:10     ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-22 10:34       ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-22 14:30         ` Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2019-04-22 22:09           ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-23  0:54             ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-23 11:12               ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-23 17:21                 ` Andy Lutomirski
2019-04-24 10:38                   ` Ingo Molnar
2019-04-22 22:04         ` Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-21 22:07   ` [PATCH v2] " Alexey Dobriyan
2019-04-22 22:40 ` [PATCH] " Linus Torvalds

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=BFD71398-0BDC-4045-91E9-C70A22FF6E73@amacapital.net \
    --to=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
    --cc=adobriyan@gmail.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=hpa@zytor.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] x86_64: uninline TASK_SIZE' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).