Re: Re: [PATCH 5.10 000/578] 5.10.80-rc2 review

[Tim Lewis <elatllat@gmail.com>]

On Thu, Nov 18, 2021 at 5:41 AM Naresh Kamboju
<naresh.kamboju@linaro.org> wrote:
...
> I have noticed intermittent failures on slow devices.
...
> When the test runs more than X time (45 sec i guess) the script will
> be killed by the runner script.

In my test environment proc-uptime-001 seems to be passing ~40% (N=10)
of the time,
and taking approximately 0.60 seconds  (~11 seconds / 18 tests).

kselftest is not timing individual targets (maybe it should?),
so I don't have a timing history but it used to pass 100% (N=60) of the time.

> We will add this as known intermittent failure.

Thanks, I'll remove it from my tests.

Data for the numbers above:

for X in $(seq 1 10) ; do echo $X && time make TARGETS="proc"
kselftest | grep -P "ok.*proc-uptime-001" ; done
1
ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001

real    0m10.605s
user    0m3.427s
sys    0m7.239s
2
not ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001 # exit=134

real    0m10.808s
user    0m3.237s
sys    0m6.614s
3
ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001

real    0m10.577s
user    0m3.377s
sys    0m7.269s
4
ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001

real    0m12.424s
user    0m3.215s
sys    0m7.402s
5
not ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001 # exit=134

real    0m11.101s
user    0m3.257s
sys    0m6.883s
6
not ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001 # exit=134

real    0m10.797s
user    0m3.199s
sys    0m6.671s
7
not ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001 # exit=134

real    0m12.817s
user    0m3.308s
sys    0m7.177s
8
not ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001 # exit=134

real    0m10.816s
user    0m3.201s
sys    0m6.663s
9
not ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001 # exit=134

real    0m10.832s
user    0m3.145s
sys    0m6.721s
10
ok 10 selftests: proc: proc-uptime-001

real    0m10.664s
user    0m3.337s
sys    0m7.375s