From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751166AbdHAFO1 (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2017 01:14:27 -0400 Received: from mail-oi0-f50.google.com ([209.85.218.50]:32886 "EHLO mail-oi0-f50.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750716AbdHAFOY (ORCPT ); Tue, 1 Aug 2017 01:14:24 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1501545093-56634-1-git-send-email-keescook@chromium.org> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2017 22:14:23 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: n1LgxqIJLUk-SQSQLxr7BSTUkL0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 00/15] exec: Use sane stack rlimit under secureexec To: Kees Cook Cc: James Morris , Andrew Morton , David Howells , "Eric W. Biederman" , John Johansen , "Serge E. Hallyn" , Paul Moore , Stephen Smalley , Casey Schaufler , Tetsuo Handa , James Morris , Andy Lutomirski , "linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" , linux-security-module , LKML Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jul 31, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote: > > And I just checked this on a separate branch, just because I wanted to > see what the overall diff was. There's a conflict [..] Side note: the overall patch looks fine to me. I like how it removes complexity and code. I didn't test it (other than test *building* the merge), so take that for what it's worth, but at least the patches look sensible both on an individual level and as an end result. Linus