From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755274Ab2LFSUA (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:20:00 -0500 Received: from mail-we0-f174.google.com ([74.125.82.174]:62743 "EHLO mail-we0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752922Ab2LFST6 (ORCPT ); Thu, 6 Dec 2012 13:19:58 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20121206175451.GC17258@suse.de> References: <20121206091744.GA1397@polaris.bitmath.org> <20121206144821.GC18547@quack.suse.cz> <20121206161934.GA17258@suse.de> <20121206175451.GC17258@suse.de> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2012 10:19:35 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: q02krgAHQ6nPjjANrTMs5jyfkOU Message-ID: Subject: Re: Oops in 3.7-rc8 isolate_free_pages_block() To: Mel Gorman Cc: Jan Kara , Henrik Rydberg , linux-mm , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 9:55 AM, Mel Gorman wrote: > > Yeah. I was listening to a talk while I was writing it, a bit cranky and > didn't see why I should suffer alone. Makes sense. > Quasimoto strikes again Is that Quasimodo's Japanese cousin? > - end_pfn = min(pfn + pageblock_nr_pages, zone_end_pfn); > + > + /* > + * As pfn may not start aligned, pfn+pageblock_nr_page > + * may cross a MAX_ORDER_NR_PAGES boundary and miss > + * a pfn_valid check. Ensure isolate_freepages_block() > + * only scans within a pageblock. > + */ > + end_pfn = ALIGN(pfn + pageblock_nr_pages, pageblock_nr_pages); > + end_pfn = min(end_pfn, end_pfn); Ok, this looks much nicer, except it's obviously buggy. The min(end_pfn, end_pfn) thing is insane, and I'm sure you meant for that line to be + end_pfn = min(end_pfn, zone_end_pfn); Henrik, does that - corrected - patch (*instead* of the previous one, not in addition to) also fix your issue? Linus