linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@kernel.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] exec: Limit arg stack to at most _STK_LIM / 4 * 3
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 15:24:04 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwJmJnv2T=WR5N2jgAJgQbwsxc=YH7YKLfXyH5KgppbCA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170707185729.GA70967@beast>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 577 bytes --]

On Fri, Jul 7, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:
> To avoid pathological stack usage or the need to special-case setuid
> execs, just limit all arg stack usage to at most _STK_LIM / 4 * 3 (6MB).

Ok, this I think I should just apply, but would prefer to avoid
multi-line complex conditionals around things like this.

So how about the attached slightly edited version instead?

I didn't test it (and I'm not really committing it until I get an ack
or two), but it seemed all ObviouslyCorrect(tm). FamousLastWords(tm).

Comments?

                Linus

[-- Attachment #2: 0001-exec-Limit-arg-stack-to-at-most-75-of-_STK_LIM.patch --]
[-- Type: text/x-patch, Size: 1721 bytes --]

From 4f677953627bc64393bcc310f4f779282a089ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Jul 2017 11:57:29 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] exec: Limit arg stack to at most 75% of _STK_LIM

To avoid pathological stack usage or the need to special-case setuid
execs, just limit all arg stack usage to at most 75% of _STK_LIM (6MB).

Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 fs/exec.c | 11 ++++++-----
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 904199086490..62175cbcc801 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -220,8 +220,7 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pos,
 
 	if (write) {
 		unsigned long size = bprm->vma->vm_end - bprm->vma->vm_start;
-		unsigned long ptr_size;
-		struct rlimit *rlim;
+		unsigned long ptr_size, limit;
 
 		/*
 		 * Since the stack will hold pointers to the strings, we
@@ -250,14 +249,16 @@ static struct page *get_arg_page(struct linux_binprm *bprm, unsigned long pos,
 			return page;
 
 		/*
-		 * Limit to 1/4-th the stack size for the argv+env strings.
+		 * Limit to 1/4 of the max stack size or 3/4 of _STK_LIM
+		 * (whichever is smaller) for the argv+env strings.
 		 * This ensures that:
 		 *  - the remaining binfmt code will not run out of stack space,
 		 *  - the program will have a reasonable amount of stack left
 		 *    to work from.
 		 */
-		rlim = current->signal->rlim;
-		if (size > READ_ONCE(rlim[RLIMIT_STACK].rlim_cur) / 4)
+		limit = _STK_LIM / 4 * 3;
+		limit = min(limit, rlimit(RLIMIT_STACK) / 4);
+		if (size > limit)
 			goto fail;
 	}
 
-- 
2.13.1.518.g0d864c4df


  reply	other threads:[~2017-07-07 22:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-07 18:57 [PATCH] exec: Limit arg stack to at most _STK_LIM / 4 * 3 Kees Cook
2017-07-07 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2017-07-08  2:46   ` Kees Cook
2017-07-10 13:13 ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 15:39   ` Kees Cook
2017-07-10 15:59     ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 18:24       ` Linus Torvalds
2017-07-10 18:38         ` Michal Hocko
2017-07-10 13:44 ` Ben Hutchings
2017-07-10 15:34   ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+55aFwJmJnv2T=WR5N2jgAJgQbwsxc=YH7YKLfXyH5KgppbCA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ben@decadent.org.uk \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=hughd@google.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=riel@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).