From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932854AbaH1BR6 (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 21:17:58 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f171.google.com ([209.85.220.171]:63109 "EHLO mail-vc0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756962AbaH1BRz (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Aug 2014 21:17:55 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20140827185138.GA12487@redhat.com> References: <20140827185138.GA12487@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 18:17:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U3t0z2EbbzcSymT6r0xCjl6ov2U Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] x86, fpu: copy_process's FPU paths cleanups From: Linus Torvalds To: Oleg Nesterov Cc: Al Viro , Andrew Morton , Fenghua Yu , Suresh Siddha , Bean Anderson , "H. Peter Anvin" , Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner , "the arch/x86 maintainers" , Linux Kernel Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Aug 27, 2014 at 11:51 AM, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > Who can review this? And where should I send FPU changes? FWIW, I have nothing against this series (or, indeed, the last series with the exception of 2/5 that got replaced by just the preemption disable). Although with the whole i387 state I always hope somebody else checks it too, and it's obviously not 3.17 material any more (possibly with the exception of the afore-mentioned preemption patch, although even that might be better off as 3.18 + stable) Linus