linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Cc: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	tcharding <me@tobin.cc>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Subject: Re: Hashed pointer issues
Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2018 16:31:52 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFwieC1-nAs+NFq9RTwaR8ef9hWa4MjNBWL41F-8wM49eA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGXu5jL1W=AC023asgeMRUXAnhU2vd-RJRqGtOOetQ=aXwDcFQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 9:11 AM Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> wrote:

> I (or other folks?) had proposed this before, but, AIUI, Linus remains
> opposed.

Yeah, I hate this, because it will make people paper over their problems by
just booting with that option.

I think it should just be fixed.

Is there really any reason why trace buffers have to be dumped so early
that the entropy hasn't even taken yet?

And if we really want a command line option, can we make that still hash
the pointer, just force the entropy early. That way kernel developers that
test that command line option are still testing the *hashing*, they just
are missing the good entropy.

                 Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2018-04-30 16:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-30 15:50 Anna-Maria Gleixner
2018-04-30 16:11 ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 16:31   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2018-04-30 16:41     ` Steven Rostedt
2018-04-30 16:57       ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-30 17:01         ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-30 17:06           ` Randy Dunlap
2018-04-30 17:12             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-05-01  7:05               ` tcharding
2018-05-03  8:41             ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2018-04-30 18:38           ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 19:00             ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-30 19:16               ` Kees Cook
2018-04-30 20:01                 ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-30 20:07                   ` Linus Torvalds
2018-04-30 21:23                 ` Tobin C. Harding

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CA+55aFwieC1-nAs+NFq9RTwaR8ef9hWa4MjNBWL41F-8wM49eA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=me@tobin.cc \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --subject='Re: Hashed pointer issues' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).