From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750904Ab3IFR4S (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:56:18 -0400 Received: from mail-vb0-f48.google.com ([209.85.212.48]:55765 "EHLO mail-vb0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750771Ab3IFR4Q (ORCPT ); Fri, 6 Sep 2013 13:56:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1378434264.4321.209.camel@pasglop> References: <1378434264.4321.209.camel@pasglop> Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2013 10:56:15 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: aDWS0Gy4VcPZH-SbiBB57vaD9Zc Message-ID: Subject: Re: [git pull] Please pull powerpc.git next branch From: Linus Torvalds To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: linuxppc-dev , Linux Kernel list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Sep 5, 2013 at 7:24 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: > > * A bunch of endian fixes ! We don't have full LE support yet in that > release but this contains a lot of fixes all over arch/powerpc to use the > proper accessors, call the firmware with the right endian mode, etc... Ok, this caused a conflict in arch/powerpc/kernel/prom.c, where some of the OF CPU number accessors had been moved to generic OF code instead. It *looks* to me like those accessors had already been made endian-clean as part of the move to generic code, and so my conflict resolution was to just ignore the parts of the changes the code that no longer exists in prom.c, but you really should double-check my resolution. Maybe I screwed it up. But apparent'y the LE mode isn't finished, so hopefully even if I read those changes wrong it won't affect you guys too badly. I didn't test-compile any of it, yadda yadda.. Linus