From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753325Ab2BBBP4 (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:15:56 -0500 Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com ([209.85.213.174]:57128 "EHLO mail-yx0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752418Ab2BBBPz (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 20:15:55 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1328144756.2768.57.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> References: <20120121082857.GC32134@elte.hu> <20120121165830.GA9216@elte.hu> <20120131115855.5861bad7@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20120131120922.GD32010@elte.hu> <20120131121820.58a1db97@pyramind.ukuu.org.uk> <20120131122339.GG32010@elte.hu> <1328144756.2768.57.camel@dabdike.int.hansenpartnership.com> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 17:15:34 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Vn9ChX7yYQHZ1X-kxfZeEdz5Tq0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH] NVMe: Fix compilation on architecturs without readq/writeq To: James Bottomley Cc: Ingo Molnar , Alan Cox , Hitoshi Mitake , Matthew Wilcox , Roland Dreier , Andrew Morton , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "hpa@linux.intel.com" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 5:05 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > > And this was about the point I concluded last time that it simply wasn't > worth it with the number of different possibilities for the primitives Umm? Two? Two really doesn't seem like a big number to me. Linus