From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1754411AbbHMXZc (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:25:32 -0400
Received: from mail-io0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]:36768 "EHLO
	mail-io0-f169.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753767AbbHMXZb (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Thu, 13 Aug 2015 19:25:31 -0400
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <CALCETrUCXkKvD2K+U2WcGg6-7aJgqJuc99NbUzH9egAFx7Supw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAHse=S8UeYVJqRBx-_wf=jeDERTJxzM=YRH5izBpQnrCHOxcDA@mail.gmail.com>
	<55CCB510.3060807@redhat.com>
	<CAHse=S8BrL6KeQL9gwa=9TH0nqWrNxq7rcHc--pAVriG+pxBmA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALCETrXP0bH9nhh=aOPsiA-Bs0zNW_0xbXFhvbMPZeDV71VtZA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAHse=S8OuPb4KFWBXJS6c9YdGPEH8MgpbWJ5qP79r04+4rK2Fw@mail.gmail.com>
	<CAGXu5j+gXShOAdK93KuVide93VYA_ObyjbK-zb7CwgOLc2JCnQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<55CD0DAC.9080809@redhat.com>
	<CALCETrWj6X+zCX47iHip0Qjp88p7f3p0uWvskL357XCyvPrXVA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+55aFyA9+16Jer2nKMOs6_uhRA-egvFDSR8fgNoD9AuPLE4GQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<CA+55aFx6Ade9UwDQ2KgsQgVMog+B9VXNYqrb1vm+EvBbkazhuA@mail.gmail.com>
	<CALCETrUCXkKvD2K+U2WcGg6-7aJgqJuc99NbUzH9egAFx7Supw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2015 16:25:30 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: 3yV8a6yV_1E_RmUvpIeGmIRaODg
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxTU02Xw9hQuGt7tvSQqwGEK8a4aDeHREDP9TOXvSUSeQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Regression v4.2 ?] 32-bit seccomp-BPF returned errno values
 wrong in VM?
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@redhat.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
        David Drysdale <drysdale@google.com>,
        "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
        Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Alok Kataria <akataria@vmware.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@plumgrid.com>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>,
        Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>, X86 ML <x86@kernel.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net> wrote:
>
> For better for for worse, the native 64-bit path changed several
> versions agi, and nothing broke that I'm aware of.

Ok, I'll take that as an ACK for the patch, and apply it, since it
seems to fix this regression.

               Linus