From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S941947AbcLWTpV (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 14:45:21 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-f65.google.com ([209.85.214.65]:33074 "EHLO mail-it0-f65.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756367AbcLWTpS (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2016 14:45:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20161223194004.GA25072@roeck-us.net> References: <20161223100754.GA19660@spo001.leaseweb.nl> <20161223194004.GA25072@roeck-us.net> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2016 11:45:16 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: BRsWch3kKOdDWcye4_9N1Pk18ek Message-ID: Subject: Re: [GIT PULL REQUEST] watchdog - v4.10 merge window To: Guenter Roeck Cc: Wim Van Sebroeck , Andrew Morton , LKML , Linux Watchdog Mailing List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 11:40 AM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > FWIW: Hey, I can generate those myself. But when they aren't generated by the person who sends the pull request, they are worthless. The whole point is that I need to get it with the pull request, so that I can see that what I get is what the requester really meant for me to get, and that (hopefully) the person who made the request looked it over and there's nothing surprising to that person either. Linus