linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Miklos Szeredi <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	hch@infradead.org, Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: dcache: fix deadlock in tree traversal
Date: Mon, 17 Sep 2012 15:09:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxeghUVxiFS=P+ck_BCnOuMm=HFAkqTBccxJoubk96afQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120917203946.GV13973@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>

On Mon, Sep 17, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>
> Egads...  The problem is real and analysis, AFAICS, is correct, but result
> is extremely ugly ;-/

Agreed.

The problem (or at least one *part* of the problem) is that the "goto
rename_retry" case is done for two different entities entirely:

 - the "try_to_ascend()" failure path, which can happen even when
renamelock is held for writing.

 - the "if we weren't write-locked before, and the read-lock failed"
case (which obviously cannot happen if we already held things for
writing)

That said, I'm not sure why/how that try_to_ascend() could even fail
when we're holding things locked. I guess it's the DCACHE_DISCONNECTED
case that triggers.

So I'll ignore this series for now, hoping that Al will send a nicer
version. Al, Miklos, please make sure this issue doesn't get dropped
by mistake.

            Linus

  reply	other threads:[~2012-09-17 22:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-09-17 20:23 [PATCH 1/2] vfs: dcache: fix deadlock in tree traversal Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-17 20:31 ` [PATCH 2/2] vfs: dcache: use DCACHE_DENTRY_KILLED instead of DCACHE_DISCONNECTED in d_kill() Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-17 20:39 ` [PATCH 1/2] vfs: dcache: fix deadlock in tree traversal Al Viro
2012-09-17 22:09   ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2012-09-18 14:53     ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-18 15:56       ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-18 16:27         ` Miklos Szeredi
2012-09-18 18:22           ` Linus Torvalds
2012-09-18 20:35 ` [PATCH] trivial select_parent documentation fix J. Bruce Fields

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CA+55aFxeghUVxiFS=P+ck_BCnOuMm=HFAkqTBccxJoubk96afQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).