From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@gmail.com>,
Nate Eldredge <nate@thatsmathematics.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@kernel.org>,
stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Maarten Baert <maarten-baert@hotmail.com>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>, George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
Pekka Riikonen <priikone@iki.fi>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt flag
Date: Sat, 1 Feb 2014 11:46:15 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFxex2ymO3k_udRL=yT9xF5PtRx=O2O2vtL76PBUE0fNtg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <52ED4C96.6020703@zytor.com>
On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 11:35 AM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote:
>
> This will obviously not protect eageronly features (MPX, LWP, ...) so this
> means those features are permanently unavailable to the kernel, even inside
> kernel_fpu_begin/end. Now, currently I don't think we have any plans to use
> those in the kernel (at least not in a way where kernel_fpu_begin/end makes
> sense as bracketing), but it is something worth keeping in mind.
Hmm. If there are features that (silently) depend on the FPU state
being on, then the plain "stts" doesn't work at all, because we'd be
returning to user space too (not just kernel space) with TS turned
off.
.. which *does* actually bring up something that might work, and might
be a good idea: remove the "restore math state or set TS" from the
normal kernel paths *entirely*, and move it to the "return to user
space" phase.
We could do that with the whole "task_work" thing (or perhaps just
do_notify_resume(), especially after merging the "don't necessarily
return with iret" patch I sent out earlier), with additionally making
sure that scheduling does the right thing wrt a "currently dirty math
state due to kernel use".
The advantage of that would be that we really could do a *lot* of FP
math very cheaply in the kernel, because we'd pay the overhead of
kernel_fpu_begin/end() just once (well, the "end" part would be just
setting the bit that we now have dirty state, the cost would be in the
return-to-user-space-and-restore-fp-state part).
Comments? That would be much more invasive than just changing
__kernel_fpu_end(), but would bring in possibly quite noticeable
advantages under loads that use the FP/vector resources in the kernel.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-02-01 19:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 41+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-30 22:01 [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt flag Nate Eldredge
2014-01-30 22:24 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-01-31 7:33 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-01 19:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-01 19:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 19:46 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2014-02-01 20:00 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 20:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-01 20:16 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 21:17 ` George Spelvin
2014-02-01 21:36 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-01 23:40 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 0:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 1:19 ` George Spelvin
2014-02-02 1:25 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 8:45 ` Pekka Riikonen
2014-02-02 1:06 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:26 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 1:35 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 1:47 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 1:57 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 2:05 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 2:12 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 1:59 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 1:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-02-02 1:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-02 7:19 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-02 19:15 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-03 6:56 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-03 18:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-02-04 6:03 ` Suresh Siddha
2014-02-06 5:26 ` Nate Eldredge
2014-02-06 5:34 ` George Spelvin
2014-02-13 15:45 ` Maarten Baert
2014-02-13 20:00 ` George Spelvin
2014-03-11 19:36 ` [tip:x86/urgent] x86, fpu: Check tsk_used_math() in kernel_fpu_end() for eager FPU tip-bot for Suresh Siddha
2014-02-27 23:44 ` [PATCH] Make math_state_restore() save and restore the interrupt flag H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-07 23:18 ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-03-08 6:18 ` Suresh Siddha
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+55aFxex2ymO3k_udRL=yT9xF5PtRx=O2O2vtL76PBUE0fNtg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=maarten-baert@hotmail.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=nate@thatsmathematics.com \
--cc=priikone@iki.fi \
--cc=sbsiddha@gmail.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).