From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754173Ab2IIPgU (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Sep 2012 11:36:20 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f178.google.com ([209.85.212.178]:58139 "EHLO mail-wi0-f178.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753063Ab2IIPgS (ORCPT ); Sun, 9 Sep 2012 11:36:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20120909155424.862635h7ncykg9s0@www.81.fi> References: <87har7h84h.fsf@silenus.orebokech.com> <20120909155424.862635h7ncykg9s0@www.81.fi> From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2012 08:35:56 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: U_LsyrZ1w0mkTstqcSdwnaFK7Uo Message-ID: Subject: Re: Linux 3.6-rc5 To: Jussi Kivilinna Cc: Romain Francoise , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Crypto Mailing List , Herbert Xu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Sep 9, 2012 at 5:54 AM, Jussi Kivilinna wrote: > > Does reverting e46e9a46386bca8e80a6467b5c643dc494861896 help? > > That commit added crypto selftest for authenc(hmac(sha1),cbc(aes)) in 3.6, > and probably made this bug visible (but not directly causing it). So Romain said it does - where do we go from here? Revert testing it, or fix the authenc() case? I'd prefer the fix.. Linus