From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: George Spelvin <linux@horizon.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 2014 15:59:36 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyWorcX0qYAcD2bj=bOqa-X6Gmb_Ph4g25nqwSPxo4XSg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140303234207.GQ18016@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 3:42 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:34:43PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>>
>> (Side note: I think sparc or something doesn't support it, and may
>> return things in memory. I can't really seem to find it in myself to
>> care)
>
> sparc64 actually does support that. So does amd64, and, with explicit
> flag, i386. No other more or less general purpose architecture does.
>
> Not ppc. Not mips. Not arm. I think that some of those are worth
> caring about...
I doubt it's worth caring about. Even when passing things in memory,
the end result isn't that much worse than the fget_light() model that
passes just one of the two fields in memory.
If the ARM/PPC people end up caring, they could add the struct-return
support to gcc. It should be basically just adding the flag for
enabling the calling convention - the core gcc support is obviously
all there, and it's just an issue of whether the calling conventions
allow it or not.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-03 23:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-03 21:03 Update of file offset on write() etc. is non-atomic with I/O George Spelvin
2014-03-03 21:26 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 21:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:01 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:28 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 23:34 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:42 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 23:59 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2014-03-04 0:23 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 0:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-04 1:05 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 20:00 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 21:17 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-05 0:04 ` Al Viro
2014-03-10 15:55 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:39 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 23:54 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 23:54 ` Al Viro
2014-03-04 20:11 ` Cedric Blancher
2014-03-04 0:07 ` George Spelvin
2014-05-04 7:04 ` Michael Kerrisk
[not found] <a8df285f-de7f-4a3a-9a19-e0ad07ab3a5c@blur>
2014-02-20 18:15 ` Zuckerman, Boris
2014-02-20 18:29 ` Al Viro
2014-02-21 6:01 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-02-23 1:18 ` Kevin Easton
2014-02-23 7:38 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-17 15:41 Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-02-18 13:00 ` Michael Kerrisk
2014-02-20 17:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 17:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 21:45 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 21:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:09 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:20 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-03 22:10 ` Al Viro
2014-03-03 22:22 ` Linus Torvalds
2014-03-06 15:03 ` Michael Kerrisk (man-pages)
2014-03-07 3:38 ` Yongzhi Pan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='CA+55aFyWorcX0qYAcD2bj=bOqa-X6Gmb_Ph4g25nqwSPxo4XSg@mail.gmail.com' \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@horizon.com \
--cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).